Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1982;65:1451-1455

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wasserman, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Rios, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wasserman, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Rios, J. C.

Circulation, Vol 65, 1451-1455, Copyright © 1982 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Prognostic implications of diagnostic Q waves after myocardial infarction

AG Wasserman, GB Bren, AM Ross, DW Richardson, RG Hutchinson and JC Rios

The long-term prognostic implications of the electrocardiographic location of a myocardial infarction and the subsequent retention or disappearance of diagnostic Q waves were examined in patients enrolled in the Aspirin Myocardial Infarction Study (AMIS). The 4524 participants, ages 30-69 years, had sustained a myocardial infarction 8 weeks to 60 months before randomization to aspirin and placebo groups. Subjects were followed for at least 3 years (average 38.2 months). Using the Minnesota Code, myocardial infarctions were classified according to three electrocardiographic locations: lateral, inferior and anterior, with further subdivision into major, moderate and minor criteria based on Q-wave duration and Q/R rations. Total mortality was not significantly different among patients with single infarct sites: lateral 11.8%, inferior 8.0% and anterior 9.4%. Patients with multiple electrocardiographic infarct locations had a significantly higher mortality (14.6%, p less than 0.0002). Participants with Minnesota Code major criteria of infarction also had a significantly higher mortality (10.6%) than those with moderate (7.2%) or minor (7.4%) criteria (p less than 0.01). Loss of a previously documented diagnostic Q wave occurred in 14.2% of participants. Mortality among patients who lost Q waves (6.5%) was not significantly different from that among those with persistent Q waves in a single infarct location (8.7%). No long-term prognostic significance can be attributed to the site of infarction or loss of Q wave on the resting ECG. However, major Q-wave criteria and extent of infarction based on multiple coded sites are associated with a higher 3-year mortality.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
V. Palmieri, P. M. Okin, J. N. Bella, E. Gerdts, K. Wachtell, J. Gardin, V. Papademetriou, M. S. Nieminen, B. Dahlof, and R. B. Devereux
Echocardiographic Wall Motion Abnormalities in Hypertensive Patients With Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: The LIFE Study
Hypertension, January 1, 2003; 41(1): 75 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J Sztajzel and P Urban
Early and late Q wave regression in the setting of acute myocardial infarction
Heart, June 1, 2000; 83(6): 708 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text]