Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1982;65:37-43

This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cosgrove, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sheldon, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cosgrove, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sheldon, W. C.

Circulation, Vol 65, 37-43, Copyright © 1982 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Results of myocardial revascularization: a 12-year experience

DM Cosgrove, FD Loop and WC Sheldon

All 740 patients who underwent isolated myocardial revascularization procedures from 1967 to 1970 at our institution were compared with the first 1000 patients who underwent similar elective operations each from 1971 to 1979. Data from these 9 years were processed through a computerized cardiovascular information registry. In the 1971-1979 period, the patients were older (median age 57 years, compared with 50 years in the 1967-1970 period), more had multivessel disease (90% vs 44%) and more had ventricular asynergy (54% vs 41%). The number of grafts per patient increased from 1.5 to 2.7, and yet morbidity declined in every category except neurologic deficit. The operative mortality rate was 1.1% from 1967 to 1979 and 1.0% from 1971 to 1979. Graft patency was determined in 475 patients from 1967 to 1970, in 533 patients from 1971, in 519 from 1972, in 540 from 1973 and in 408 from 1974. Patency rates after a mean catheterization interval of 21 months were 77%, 77%, 84%, 87% and 87%, respectively. Five- and 10-year follow- ups were completed for the 1967-1970 series and a 5-year follow-up was completed for 1971, 1972, 1973 and 1974 cohorts. The 5- and 10-year actuarial survival rates for the 1967-1970 series were 89.4% and 77.3%, respectively. The 5-year survival rates for the 1971-1974 series were 91.9%, 93.4%, 92.1% and 91.7%. Abnormal ventricular function and incomplete revascularization adversely influenced the mortality rate (p less than 0.05) in all years. The percentage of asymptomatic patients at 5 years was 66%, 65%, 69%, 67% and 74% for the five patient cohorts. Lower risk and a higher 5-year survival rate are attributable to greater technical experience, changing technology and improved management rather than to selection of lower-risk cases. These 5- and 10-year survival rates compare favorably with the reported results of medical therapy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
E. Kuralay, E. Kuralay, U. Demirkilic, E. Ozal, M. Uzun, and H. Tatar
Myocardial Ischemia After Coronary Bypass: Comparison of Trimetazidine and Diltiazem
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, June 1, 1999; 7(2): 84 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]