Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1982;65:67-71

This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation

Circulation, Vol 65, 67-71, Copyright © 1982 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Prospective randomized study of coronary artery bypass surgery in stable angina pectoris: a progress report on survival


This progress report on the prospective randomized study of the effect of coronary bypass surgery on prognosis presents the results of a minimum follow-up of 4 years. Seven hundred sixty-eight patients were recruited; all were men younger than age 65 years who had mild-to- moderate angina pectoris, at least two-vessel disease, and good left ventricular function. Of these, 373 were randomized to medical treatment and 395 to surgical treatment. Although 83 "medical" patients subsequently underwent surgery and 27 "surgical" patients did not undergo surgery, these patients were not excluded from the analysis, and the group randomized to coronary bypass surgery was compared with the group randomized to medical treatment. The surgical treatment group showed significantly better survival than the medical treatment group in the total patient population (p less than 0.001), particularly among patients with three-vessel disease (p less than 0.001). Although the 24% higher survival among surgical patients with left main coronary artery disease failed to reach statistical significance, the trend is probably meaningful. No significant difference in survival between medical and surgical treatment groups was noted in patients with two- vessel disease.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. B. Wong, F. A. Sonnenberg, D. N. Salem, and S. G. Pauker
Myocardial Revascularization for Chronic Stable Angina: Analysis of the Role of Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Based on Data Available in 1989
Ann Intern Med, December 1, 1990; 113(11): 852 - 871.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. E. Vlietstra, R. A. Kronmal, A. Oberman, R. L. Frye, and T. Killip III
Effect of Cigarette Smoking on Survival of Patients With Angiographically Documented Coronary Artery Disease: Report From the CASS Registry
JAMA, February 28, 1986; 255(8): 1023 - 1027.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
P. Doubilet, B. J. McNeil, and M. C. Weinstein
The Decision Concerning Coronary Angiography in Patients with Chest Pain: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Med Decis Making, January 1, 1985; 5(3): 293 - 309.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
G. M. Lawrie and M. E. DeBakey
The Coronary Artery Surgery Study
JAMA, November 9, 1984; 252(18): 2609 - 2611.
[PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
T. C. M. Li, H. Sherman, E. F. Cook, G. H. Mudge, N. Mitchell, M. Flatley, R. Rosati, and L. Goldman
The Selective Impact of a Cardiology Data Bank on Physicians' Therapeutic Recommendations
Med Decis Making, January 1, 1984; 4(2): 165 - 176.
[PDF]