This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Litchfield, R. L. Articles by Marcus, M. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Litchfield, R. L. Articles by Marcus, M. L.

Circulation, Vol 66, 129-134, Copyright © 1982 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Normal exercise capacity in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: compensatory mechanisms

RL Litchfield, RE Kerber, JW Benge, AL Mark, J Sopko, RK Bhatnagar and ML Marcus

About one-third of patients who have severe left ventricular dysfunction can achieve normal levels of exercise. To elucidate the mechanisms that permit this to occur, we studied six patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (average left ventricular ejection fraction 17 +/- 2.5% [mean +/- SEM]) who achieved nearly normal levels of exercise tolerance (greater than 11 minutes of treadmill exercise, Sheffield protocol). All patients had normal pulmonary function at rest and during exercise. Hemodynamics were measured at rest and during supine and upright exercise. The major mechanisms of the preserved exercise capacity in these patients were chronotropic competence, ability to tolerate elevated wedge pressures (33 +/- 3 mm Hg) without dyspnea, ventricular dilation, and increased levels of plasma norepinephrine at rest and during exercise. Also, whereas peripheral vascular resistance was unchanged during supine exercise, it decreased by 50% during similar levels of upright exercise. As a consequence, increases in cardiac output from rest to exercise were greater during upright than supine exercise (100% vs 50%, respectively) (p less than 0.05), and pulmonary wedge pressures were lower during upright than supine exercise (21 +/- 5 mm Hg vs 33 +/- 3 mm Hg). Thus, multiple mechanisms permit some patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction to achieve normal levels of exercise. These studies emphasize that left ventricular function must be assessed by direct means rather than inferring function of the left ventricle from the results of an exercise tolerance test.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Isnard, P. Lechat, H. Kalotka, H. Chikr, S. Fitoussi, J. Salloum, J.-L. Golmard, D. Thomas, and M. Komajda Muscular blood flow response to submaximal leg exercise in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure J Appl Physiol, December 1, 1996; 81(6): 2571 - 2579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Myers and V. F. Froelicher Hemodynamic Determinants of Exercise Capacity in Chronic Heart Failure Ann Intern Med, September 1, 1991; 115(5): 377 - 386. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. A. Weiner Evaluating the Conditions of Patients With Congestive Heart Failure by Exercise Testing Arch Intern Med, October 1, 1983; 143(10): 1978 - 1980. [Abstract] [PDF]