Circulation, Vol 66, 196-201, Copyright © 1982 by American Heart Association
CR Kerr, JJ Gallagher and LD German
During reciprocating tachycardia in patients with accessory
atrioventricular pathways, the observation of changes in ventriculoatrial
(VA) intervals with bundle branch block (BBB) aberration has been used to
localize the site of the pathway and prove the participation of the pathway
in the tachycardia. In this report we present the changes observed during
BBB in 93 patients with single atrioventricular pathways in whom the site
of their pathways was subsequently proved at the time of their surgical
interruption. In patients with left or right free wall pathways, the
minimum VA interval (VA min) increased by 61 +/- 19 msec with ipsilateral
BBB, whereas no change occurred with contralateral BBB. The smallest
increase in the VA interval was 35 msec. In 14 patients, shortening of the
AH intervals resulted in changes in overall cycle length that were less
than 35 msec. Patients with septal pathways all had changes in VA min of 25
msec or less with either right or left bundle branch block (RBBB or LBBB),
which suggests that a clear differentiation between septal and free wall
pathways can be made on the basis of changes in VA min. In patients with
anteroseptal pathways, VA min intervals frequently prolonged with RBBB (16
+/- 9 msec) but not with LBBB. In patients with posteroseptal pathways, VA
min frequently prolonged with LBBB (13 +/- 8 msec) but not with RBBB.
Therefore, the observed changes in VA min with BBB may serve as an
important indicator of the site of an accessory pathway and may provide
guidance in the choice of surgical therapy.
ARTICLES
Changes in ventriculoatrial intervals with bundle branch block aberration during reciprocating tachycardia in patients with accessory atrioventricular pathways
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Extramiana, S. Takatsuki, M. Hayashi, and A. Leenhardt Functional bundle branch block and orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia cycle length: do not bet on accessory pathway location Europace, October 1, 2007; 9(10): 920 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G Katritsis and A. J. Camm Classification and differential diagnosis of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia. Europace, January 1, 2006; 8(1): 29 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. Knight, M. Ebinger, H. Oral, M. H. Kim, C. Sticherling, F. Pelosi, G. F. Michaud, S. A. Strickberger, and F. Morady Diagnostic value of tachycardia features and pacing maneuvers during paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2000; 36(2): 574 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Etheridge and V. E. Judd Supraventricular Tachycardia in Infancy: Evaluation, Management, and Follow-up Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, March 1, 1999; 153(3): 267 - 271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1982 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |