Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1982;66:83-92

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tasto, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tasto, D. L.

Circulation, Vol 66, 83-92, Copyright © 1982 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Feasibility of altering type A behavior pattern after myocardial infarction. Recurrent Coronary Prevention Project Study: methods, baseline results and preliminary findings

M Friedman, CE Thoresen, JJ Gill, D Ulmer, L Thompson, L Powell, V Price, SR Elek, DD Rabin, WS Breall, G Piaget, T Dixon, E Bourg, RA Levy and DL Tasto

We studied 1035 consecutive postinfarction patients to determine the feasibility of altering type A behavior and the effect such alteration might have on subsequent rates of infarction and cardiovascular death. Approximately 300 subjects were enrolled in small groups and primarily received cardiologic counseling on the usually accepted coronary risk factors. Six hundred subjects received, in addition to cardiologic counseling, advice and instructions designed to diminish the intensity of their type A behavior. The remaining subjects, serving as controls, received no counseling, but were examined and interviewed annually, as were those who dropped out of counseling groups. More than 98% of the 1035 subjects exhibited moderate-to-severe type A behavior during a videotaped structured interview. After the first year of this 5-year study, the rates of infarction and cardiovascular death were lower (p less than 0.01 and p less than 0.05, respectively) among subjects who received both cardiologic and behavioral counseling than among the control subjects. The rate of nonfatal infarction was lower (p less than 0.05) among subjects who received behavioral counseling than among those who received only cardiologic counseling or those who dropped out of either counseling group. The circumstances that most often preceded recurrent infarction or cardiovascular death were emotional crisis, excess physical activity, ingestion of a single fatty meal or a combination of these phenomena.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
A. Ikeda, H. Iso, I. Kawachi, M. Inoue, S. Tsugane, and for the JPHC Study Group
Type A behaviour and risk of coronary heart disease: The JPHC Study
Int. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2008; (2008) dyn124v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Counseling PsychologistHome page
C. E. Thoresen and J. R. Eagleston
Counseling for Health
The Counseling Psychologist, January 1, 1985; 13(1): 15 - 87.
[Abstract]