This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pfisterer, M. Articles by Burkart, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pfisterer, M. Articles by Burkart, F.

Circulation, Vol 67, 291-301, Copyright © 1983 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Comparative effects of nitroglycerin, nifedipine and metoprolol on regional left ventricular function in patients with one-vessel coronary disease

M Pfisterer, L Glaus and F Burkart

To compare acute effects of nitroglycerin (0.8 mg sublingually), nifedipine (5 ng/kg/min i.v.) and metoprolol (0.15 mg/kg i.v.) on normal, ischemic and scarred myocardial segments in man, we performed simultaneous hemodynamic and radionuclide measurements of left ventricular functions. Sixteen patients with isolated left anterior descending (LAD) disease were studied at rest and during exercise. Nine patients had angina and exercise-induced ischemia (LAD stenosis) and seven patients had previous transmural myocardial infarction and no ischemic changes during thallium imaging (LAD occlusion). The effects of the drugs on regional ejection fraction of the involved anteroseptal region and the normal posterolateral area were compared. Global ejection fraction at rest did not change after nitroglycerin, increased after nifedipine and decreased after metoprolol. In patients with ischemia, the exercise ejection fraction improved after all drugs due to increased regional ejection fraction in ischemic segments: i.e., a regional antiischemic effect evidenced by improved regional function could be demonstrated with all three agents. Regional ejection fraction increased from 35.8 +/- 19.5% to 66.2 +/- 15.2% (+/- SD) after nitroglycerin (p less than 0.001), to 61.7 +/- 8.7% after nifedipine (p less than 0.001), and to 48.4 +/- 7.0% after metoprolol (p less than 0.01). In regions of myocardial scar, regional ejection fraction was not changed after any drug. In normal areas, regional ejection fraction remained unchanged after nitroglycerin and nifedipine, but decreased after metoprolol. Despite similar antiischemic effects of all three drugs, underlying hemodynamic mechanisms were quite different and may provide a rationale for combined forms of treatment. These results may help to select optimal drug combinations to improve myocardial performance in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. D. Kakhki, S. R. Zakavi, R. Sadeghi, and A. Yousefi Importance of Gated Imaging in Both Phases of Myocardial Perfusion SPECT: Myocardial Stunning After Dipyridamole Infusion. J. Nucl. Med. Technol., June 1, 2006; 34(2): 88 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Merino, E. Alegria, R. Castello, M. Fidalgo, A. Abecia, and D. Martinez-Caro Complementary Mechanisms of Atenolol and Diltiazem in the Clinical Improvement of Patients with Stable Angina Angiology, July 1, 1989; 40(7): 626 - 632. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. M. MacMillan, Se Do Cha, and V. Maranhao Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Nifedipine During Supine Exercise in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction Angiology, March 1, 1986; 37(3): 168 - 174. [Abstract] [PDF]