Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1983;67:1204-1210

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Campos, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Campos, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R. H.

Circulation, Vol 67, 1204-1210, Copyright © 1983 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Comparison of rest and exercise radionuclide angiocardiography and exercise treadmill testing for diagnosis of anatomically extensive coronary artery disease

CT Campos, HW Chu, HJ D'Agostino Jr and RH Jones

The accuracy of rest and exercise radionuclide angiocardiography (RNA) and exercise treadmill testing (ETT) for diagnosis of three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease (extensive CAD) was determined in 544 patients. ETT and RNA sensitivities were similar (88% vs 92%, NS), but ETT was more specific than RNA (46% vs 34%, p less than 0.01). The prevalence of extensive CAD in patients with a positive treadmill (41%) increased only 3% when the RNA was also positive. However, in the 292 patients with a negative or indeterminate ETT, a positive RNA increased this prevalence from 16% to 23%, while a negative RNA decreased this prevalence to 5%. These results support the initial use of ETT followed by RNA if the treadmill is negative or indeterminate for diagnosis in a population with a high prevalence of extensive CAD. This approach separates patients into subgroups with a high or low probability of extensive CAD.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
H. L. Sacher, M. L. Sacher, S. W. Landau, K. A. Dietrich, A. Chien, and F. Dooley
First-Pass Radionuclide Cineangiography: A Reevaluation of Its Sensitivity and Limitations in the Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease
Angiology, June 1, 1992; 43(6): 470 - 476.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. M. Bodenheimer
Risk Stratification in Coronary Disease: A Contrary Viewpoint
Ann Intern Med, June 1, 1992; 116(11): 927 - 936.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
T. Konishi, T. Ichikawa, N. Isaka, M. Sugawa, and T. Nakano
Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation Using Gated Radionuclide Ventriculography: Analysis of Left Atrial Time Activity Curve
Angiology, May 1, 1990; 41(5): 387 - 393.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
R. L. Lewis, J. S. Videll, M. D. Strong, V. Maranhao, and F. J. Lumia
Exercise Radionuclide Assessment of Left Ventricular Function Before and After Coronary Bypass Surgery
Angiology, August 1, 1987; 38(8): 601 - 608.
[Abstract] [PDF]