Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1983;68:23-32

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahmud, R.
Right arrow Articles by Akhtar, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mahmud, R.
Right arrow Articles by Akhtar, M.

Circulation, Vol 68, 23-32, Copyright © 1983 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Atrioventricular sequential pacing: differential effect on retrograde conduction related to level of impulse collision

R Mahmud, M Lehmann, S Denker, CJ Gilbert and M Akhtar

Patients with DDD pacemakers who have intact retrograde conduction are known to be at risk of developing ventricular and "endless loop" tachycardia. To address this problem, a pacing protocol was designed in which V2A2 conduction was assessed in 16 patients during ventricular pacing alone (standard method) and during paced atrioventricular (AV) sequential drive (AV sequential method); the results were then compared. In eight of 16 patients who had intact retrograde conduction with both methods (group 1), the V2A2 intervals were significantly shorter (by 60 to 340 msec) with the AV sequential method. In the remaining eight patients, who demonstrated V2A2 block with the standard method, no V2A2 block occurred with the AV sequential method. In this study, two sets of AV intervals were programmed to produce collision of the two impulses (atrial and ventricular), either in the AV node or the His-Purkinje system (HPS). The site of V2A2 facilitation was related to the site of impulse collision. These results can be explained by earlier excitation by the atrial impulse (of AV node and/or HPS) during AV sequential pacing. However, in some cases it was evident that antegrade propagation of the atrial impulse was responsible for subsequent facilitation. The data suggest that assessment of retrograde conduction in candidates for DDD pacemakers can be made most accurately by the AV sequential method.