Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1983;68:337-347

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spiller, P.
Right arrow Articles by Pannek, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spiller, P.
Right arrow Articles by Pannek, H.

Circulation, Vol 68, 337-347, Copyright © 1983 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Measurement of systolic and diastolic flow rates in the coronary artery system by x-ray densitometry

P Spiller, FK Schmiel, B Politz, M Block, U Fermor, W Hackbarth, J Jehle, R Korfer and H Pannek

The reliability of a modified videodensitometric and photodensitometric sampling technique for measuring phasic flow rates in the coronary artery system was examined. Electromagnetic flow measurements were performed in a circulatory model with continuous and pulsatile flow and intraoperatively in aortocoronary bypass grafts; cineangiograms were made simultaneously. Based on the front velocities of injected boluses of contrast medium, the densitometric measurement overestimated the electromagnetically measured flow systematically by about 20%. Systolic and diastolic flow rates in aortocoronary bypass grafts and coronary arteries determined from biplane cineangiograms in 34 patients generally revealed the typical pulsatile flow pattern familiar from electromagnetic and ultrasonic flow measurements. Flow velocities in unstenosed coronary arteries were nearly identical before and after branchings of the vessels, whereas the corresponding flow rates were higher in proximal than in distal segments. The identical flow velocities in different branches of the same vessel and the low variability of this parameter in different patients may be a suitable index of the effect of stenoses on coronary arterial blood flow.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
The ENCORE Investigators*
Effect of Nifedipine and Cerivastatin on Coronary Endothelial Function in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: The ENCORE I Study (Evaluation of Nifedipine and Cerivastatin On Recovery of coronary Endothelial function)
Circulation, January 28, 2003; 107(3): 422 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Molloi, A. Ersahin, J. Tang, J. Hicks, and C. Y. Leung
Quantification of Volumetric Coronary Blood Flow With Dual-Energy Digital Subtraction Angiography
Circulation, May 15, 1996; 93(10): 1919 - 1927.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
T. Takeda, M. Matsuda, T. Ogawa, R. Ajisaka, M. Kakihana, Y. Sugishita, I. Ito, M. Akisada, and T. Akatsuka
Evaluation of Myocardial Perfusion Abnormality by Profile Analysis for Digital Subtraction Angiogram
Angiology, March 1, 1989; 40(3): 175 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]