Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1983;68:763-766

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manning, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kaminski, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manning, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kaminski, J.

Circulation, Vol 68, 763-766, Copyright © 1983 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Miscuffing: inappropriate blood pressure cuff application

DM Manning, C Kuchirka and J Kaminski

For the accurate indirect measurement of blood pressure (BP), the American Heart Association (AHA) now recommends that cuff size should be based solely on limb circumference. We studied prevailing cuffing habits and compared them with newly revised AHA guidelines. Monitoring our staff's cuff applications, we found that "miscuffing" occurred in 65 (32%) of 200 BP determinations on 167 unselected adult outpatients, including 61 (72%) of 85 readings taken on "nonstandard" size arms. Undercuffing large arms was the most frequent error, accounting for 84% of the miscuffings. Considering that miscuffing distorts BP readings by an average of 8.5 mm Hg systolic and 4.6 mm Hg diastolic, we can improve the accuracy of our BP determinations by remarking our cuffs and using the new AHA guidelines.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. G. Pickering, J. E. Hall, L. J. Appel, B. E. Falkner, J. Graves, M. N. Hill, D. W. Jones, T. Kurtz, S. G. Sheps, and E. J. Roccella
Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans and Experimental Animals: Part 1: Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans: A Statement for Professionals From the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research
Circulation, February 8, 2005; 111(5): 697 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
T. G. Pickering, J. E. Hall, L. J. Appel, B. E. Falkner, J. Graves, M. N. Hill, D. W. Jones, T. Kurtz, S. G. Sheps, and E. J. Roccella
Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans and Experimental Animals: Part 1: Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans: A Statement for Professionals From the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research
Hypertension, January 1, 2005; 45(1): 142 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
K. A. Mundt, L. E. Chambless, C. B. Burnham, and G. Heiss
Measuring Ankle Systolic Blood Pressure: Validation of the Dinamap 1846 SX
Angiology, July 1, 1992; 43(7): 555 - 566.
[Abstract] [PDF]