Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1984;69:120-124

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wellens, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dassen, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wellens, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dassen, W. R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*AMIODARONE HYDROCHLORIDE
*Genetics Home Reference

Circulation, Vol 69, 120-124, Copyright © 1984 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

A comparison of the electrophysiologic effects of intravenous and oral amiodarone in the same patient

HJ Wellens, P Brugada, H Abdollah and WR Dassen

In 12 patients (nine with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and three with ventricular tachycardia) the electrophysiologic effects of intravenous (5 mg/kg body weight in 1 min) and oral (total dose 9800 to 11,200 mg) amiodarone were studied with programmed stimulation of the heart. Intravenous and oral amiodarone had a similar (p less than .05) effect of lengthening on the effective refractory period of the atrioventricular node. Only intravenous amiodarone prolonged (p less than .05) the AH interval. Oral amiodarone was more effective than intravenous amiodarone in lengthening the anterograde effective refractory period of the accessory atrioventricular pathway. Only oral amiodarone prolonged the effective refractory period of atrium and ventricle and the HV interval, all significantly (p less than .05). Intravenous amiodarone slowed (p less than .05) the rate of circus- movement tachycardia in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, and further slowing was observed after oral amiodarone. Termination of tachycardia by intravenous amiodarone predicted prevention of reinitiation of tachycardia during oral amiodarone. These data indicate that intravenous and oral amiodarone do not have the same electrophysiologic effects. It is not clear whether cumulative effects, active metabolites, or both are responsible for these differences.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
D R Tomlinson, P Cherian, T R Betts, and Y Bashir
Intravenous amiodarone for the pharmacological termination of haemodynamically-tolerated sustained ventricular tachycardia: is bolus dose amiodarone an appropriate first-line treatment?
Emerg. Med. J., January 1, 2008; 25(1): 15 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Chevalier, A. Durand-Dubief, H. Burri, M. Cucherat, G. Kirkorian, and P. Touboul
Amiodarone versus placebo and class ic drugs for cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 15, 2003; 41(2): 255 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
S. C. Verduyn, J. M. v. Opstal, J. D. Leunissen, and M. A. Vos
Assessment of the Pro-Arrhythmic Potential of Anti-Arrhythmic Drugs: An Experimental Approach
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2001; 6(1): 89 - 97.
[PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
L Bianconi, A Castro, M Dinelli, P Alboni, A Pappalardo, E Richiardi, and M Santini
Comparison of intravenously administered dofetilide versus amiodarone in the acute termination of atrial fibrillation and flutter. A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2000; 21(15): 1265 - 1273.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
J. Merot, F. Charpentier, J.-M. Poirier, G. Coutris, and J. Weissenburger
Effects of chronic treatment by amiodarone on transmural heterogeneity of canine ventricular repolarization in vivo: interactions with acute sotalol
Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 1999; 44(2): 303 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
Y. Kreiss, Y. Sidi, and H. Gur
Efficacy and safety of intravenous amiodarone in recent-onset atrial fibrillation: experience in patients admitted to a general internal medicine department
Postgrad. Med. J., May 1, 1999; 75(883): 278 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C.-T. Tai, S.-A. Chen, A.-N. Feng, W.-C. Yu, Y.-J. Chen, and M.-S. Chang
Electropharmacologic Effects of Class I and Class III Antiarrhythmia Drugs on Typical Atrial Flutter : Insights Into the Mechanism of Termination
Circulation, May 19, 1998; 97(19): 1935 - 1945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
I. Kodama, K. Kamiya, and J. Toyama
Cellular electropharmacology of amiodarone
Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 1997; 35(1): 13 - 29.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. N. Nanas and J. W. Mason
Pharmacokinetics and Regional Electrophysiological Effects of Intracoronary Amiodarone Administration
Circulation, January 15, 1995; 91(2): 451 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
X.-J. Du, M. D. Esler, and A. M. Dart
Sympatholytic Action of Intravenous Amiodarone in the Rat Heart
Circulation, January 15, 1995; 91(2): 462 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text]