This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Senges, J. Articles by Kubler, W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Senges, J. Articles by Kubler, W.

Circulation, Vol 69, 577-584, Copyright © 1984 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Electrophysiologic testing in assessment of therapy with sotalol for sustained ventricular tachycardia

J Senges, W Lengfelder, R Jauernig, E Czygan, J Brachmann, I Rizos, S Cobbe and W Kubler

Eighteen patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia underwent electrophysiologic studies to establish the therapeutic efficacy of sotalol. In each patient ventricular tachycardia could be reproducibly initiated by programmed stimulation during control studies. Sotalol prevented induction of sustained ventricular tachycardia in 12 of the 18 patients (67%). Prolongation of the QTC interval and of ventricular refractoriness was regularly observed after sotalol but did not reliably predict prophylactic efficacy. Severe adverse effects, including congestive heart failure and sinus node dysfunction, were noted early during sotalol therapy in three patients. Nine patients were placed on long-term oral treatment with sotalol and four patients on another effective agent. In these 13 patients, complete (12 patients) or partial (one patient) long-term prophylaxis against ventricular tachycardia was documented over a mean follow-up period of 16 months (range 8 to 24). The study suggests that sotalol can provide effective prophylaxis against sustained ventricular tachycardia; this prophylactic efficacy is not typical for pure beta-adrenergic antagonism but may at least partly result from experimentally observed prolongation of the ventricular action potential duration.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Kovoor, V. Eipper, K. Byth, M.J. Cooper, J.B. Uther, and D.L. Ross Comparison of sotalol with amiodarone for long-term treatment of spontaneous sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia based on coronary artery disease Eur. Heart J., March 1, 1999; 20(5): 364 - 374. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. Kuhlkamp, C. Mewis, J. Mermi, R. F. Bosch, and L. Seipel Suppression of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: a comparison of d,l-sotalol with no antiarrhythmic drug treatment J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 1999; 33(1): 46 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. N. Singh Review : Sotalol: Current Status and Expanding Indications Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1, 1999; 4(1): 49 - 65. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Bocker, W. Haverkamp, M. Block, M. Borggrefe, D. Hammel, and G. Breithardt Comparison of d,l-Sotalol and Implantable Defibrillators for Treatment of Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia or Fibrillation in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Circulation, July 15, 1996; 94(2): 151 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. Holubarsch, R. Schneider, B. Pieske, T. Ruf, G. Hasenfuss, G. Fraedrich, H. Posival, and H. Just Positive and Negative Inotropic Effects of DL-Sotalol and D-Sotalol in Failing and Nonfailing Human Myocardium Under Physiological Experimental Conditions Circulation, November 15, 1995; 92(10): 2904 - 2910. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. H. Hohnloser and R. L. Woosley Sotalol N. Engl. J. Med., July 7, 1994; 331(1): 31 - 38. [Full Text]