Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1984;69:740-747

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muller, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Serfas, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Muller, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Serfas, D. H.

Circulation, Vol 69, 740-747, Copyright © 1984 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Nifedipine therapy for patients with threatened and acute myocardial infarction: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison

JE Muller, J Morrison, PH Stone, RE Rude, B Rosner, R Roberts, DL Pearle, ZG Turi, JF Schneider and DH Serfas

Preliminary clinical and laboratory observations suggest that nifedipine might prevent progression of threatened myocardial infarction by reversing coronary spasm or might limit necrosis during the course of acute myocardial infarction. We screened 3143 patients with ischemic pain of greater than 45 min duration and randomly assigned 105 eligible patients with threatened myocardial infarction and 66 with acute myocardial infarction to receive nifedipine (20 mg orally every 4 hr for 14 days) or placebo plus standard care. Treatment was started 4.6 +/- 0.1 hr after the onset of pain. Infarct size index was calculated by the MB-creatine kinase (CK) method and expressed as CK-geq/m2 +/- SE. The incidence of progression to infarction among patients with threatened myocardial infarction was not significantly altered by nifedipine (36 of 48 [75%] for placebo-treated and 43 of 57 [75%] for nifedipine-treated patients). Furthermore, infarct size index was similar among placebo- and nifedipine-treated patients (16.9 +/- 1.5 MB-CK-geq/m2, n = 65, and 17.0 +/- 1.5 MB-CK-geq/m2, n = 68, respectively) with threatened myocardial infarction who exhibited infarction and for those with acute myocardial infarction. Among the 171 eligible patients randomly assigned to drug or placebo, 6 month mortality did not differ significantly (8.5% for placebo vs 10.1% for nifedipine, NS), but mortality in the 2 weeks after randomization was significantly higher for nifedipine-treated patients (0% for placebo compared with 7.9% for nifedipine, p = .018).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J Abdulla, B Brendorp, C Torp-Pedersen, L Kober, and on behalf of the TRACE study group
Does the electrocardiographic presence of Q waves influence the survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Eur. Heart J., June 2, 2001; 22(12): 1008 - 1014.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. R. Kizer and S. E. Kimmel
Epidemiologic Review of the Calcium Channel Blocker Drugs: An Up-to-date Perspective on the Proposed Hazards
Arch Intern Med, May 14, 2001; 161(9): 1145 - 1158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C. D. Frances, A. S. Go, K. W. Dauterman, K. Deosaransingh, D. L. Jung, S. Gettner, J. M. Newman, B. M. Massie, and W. S. Browner
Outcome Following Acute Myocardial Infarction: Are Differences Among Physician Specialties the Result of Quality of Care or Case Mix?
Arch Intern Med, July 12, 1999; 159(13): 1429 - 1436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. M. Zaacks, P. R. Liebson, J. E. Calvin, J. E. Parrillo, and L. W. Klein
Unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction: does the clinical diagnosis have therapeutic implications?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 1999; 33(1): 107 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
L. D. Ramunno, T. A. Dodds, and N. D. Traven
Cooperative Cardiovascular Project (CCP) Quality Improvement in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont
Eval Health Prof, December 1, 1998; 21(4): 442 - 460.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Theroux, J. Gregoire, C. Chin, G. Pelletier, P. de Guise, and M. Juneau
Intravenous diltiazem in acute myocardial infarction: Diltiazem as adjunctive therapy to activase (DATA) trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1998; 32(3): 620 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
R. H Mehta and K. A Eagle
Fortnightly review: Secondary prevention in acute myocardial infarction
BMJ, March 14, 1998; 316(7134): 838 - 842.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. H. Opie and F. H. Messerli
Nifedipine and Mortality : Grave Defects in the Dossier
Circulation, September 1, 1995; 92(5): 1068 - 1073.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. A. Kloner
Nifedipine in Ischemic Heart Disease
Circulation, September 1, 1995; 92(5): 1074 - 1078.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. D. Furberg, B. M. Psaty, and J. V. Meyer
Nifedipine : Dose-Related Increase in Mortality in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease
Circulation, September 1, 1995; 92(5): 1326 - 1331.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
B. W. Johansson, O. Hansen, S. Juul-Moller, and O. Svensson
Adrenaline-Induced Changes in Serum Electrolytes, ECG, and Blood Pressure, with Ca-Blockade Pretreatment
Angiology, April 1, 1988; 39(4): 345 - 354.
[Abstract] [PDF]