Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1984;70:226-232

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feneley, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hickie, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feneley, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hickie, J. B.

Circulation, Vol 70, 226-232, Copyright © 1984 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Validity of echocardiographic determination of left ventricular systolic wall thickening

MP Feneley and JB Hickie

Previous direct measurements of left ventricular systolic wall thickening (SWT) in animal studies have yielded values approximately one-half those found echocardiographically in humans, suggesting a possible overestimation of SWT by echocardiographic techniques. To test the validity of echocardiographic SWT measurements, the relationship between echocardiographically determined end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular short-axis myocardial cross-sectional areas (ED Myo CSA and ES Myo CSA, respectively) was assessed in 18 normal subjects. Since Myo CSA is a function of wall thickness and wall circumference, overestimation of SWT by echocardiography would be expected to produce an overestimation of ES Myo CSA relative to ED Myo CSA. SWT, as determined by both M mode (52%) and two-dimensional echocardiography (48%), was consistent with previously reported echocardiographic values, but exceeded that reported in animal studies. By least squares linear regression analysis, ES Myo CSA was 1.078 X ED Myo CSA - 0.385 cm2 (r = .947 SEE = 1.183 cm2) when assessed by one observer and was 1.042 X ED Myo CSA - 0.142 cm2 (r = .906, SEE = 1.831 cm2) when assessed independently by another. The close relationship observed between echocardiographically determined ES Myo CSA and ED Myo CSA was consistent with constant left ventricular myocardial mass throughout the cardiac cycle and thus did not suggest an overestimation of SWT by echocardiographic techniques.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
H. Masugata, S. Senda, A. Kinoshita, Xin Lu, H. Sakamoto, S. Sakamoto, H. Matsuo, and K. Mizushige
Tissue Characterization of Myocardial Cells by Use of High-Frequency Acoustic Microscopy: Differential Myocyte Sound Speed and Its Transmural Variation in Normal, Pressure-Overload Hypertrophic, and Amyloid Myocardium
Angiology, October 1, 1999; 50(10): 837 - 845.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S.-J. Dong, A. P. Crawley, J. H. MacGregor, Y. F. Petrank, D. W. Bergman, I. Belenkie, E. R. Smith, J. V. Tyberg, and R. Beyar
Regional Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Relation to the Cavity Geometry in Patients With Chronic Right Ventricular Pressure Overload : A Three-Dimensional Tagged Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
Circulation, May 1, 1995; 91(9): 2359 - 2370.
[Abstract] [Full Text]