This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kerber, R. E. Articles by Charbonnier, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kerber, R. E. Articles by Charbonnier, F.

Circulation, Vol 70, 303-308, Copyright © 1984 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Advance prediction of transthoracic impedance in human defibrillation and cardioversion: importance of impedance in determining the success of low-energy shocks

RE Kerber, C Kouba, J Martins, K Kelly, R Low, R Hoyt, D Ferguson, L Bailey, P Bennett and F Charbonnier

The purposes of this study were to evaluate a method that predicts transthoracic impedance in advance of defibrillating shocks in humans and to assess the importance of transthoracic impedance in low-energy defibrillation. Via defibrillator electrodes we applied 31 kHz current to the chest during the defibrillator charge cycle, before the defibrillating shock was actually delivered. The current flow was limited by transthoracic impedance; a microprocessor monitored the predischarge current flow and determined the predischarge impedance by calibration against known resistance values. Actual impedance to the defibrillating shock was also determined and compared with the predicted impedance. With this approach we predicted impedance in 19 patients who received 66 shocks for ventricular and atrial arrhythmias. Predicted impedance (y) correlated very well with actual impedance (x):y = .90x + 11.3; r = .97. To determine the importance of impedance in defibrillation and cardioversion, we prospectively gathered data from 96 patients who received shocks of various energies for ventricular or atrial arrhythmias. In patients with high transthoracic impedance (greater than 97 omega), low-energy shocks (less than or equal to 100 J) for ventricular defibrillation had only a 20% success rate as opposed to a 70% success rate for low-energy shocks in patients with low or average impedance (p less than .05). We conclude that transthoracic impedance can be accurately predicted in advance of defibrillation and cardioversion. This method permits the preshock identification of patients with high impedance in whom attempts to defibrillate with low-energy shocks are inappropriate.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. W. Hatton, L. C. Kilinski, C. Ramaiah, and R. M. Schell Multiple Failed External Defibrillation Attempts During Robot-Assisted Internal Mammary Harvest for Myocardial Revascularization Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2006; 103(5): 1113 - 1114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Part 5: Electrical Therapies: Automated External Defibrillators, Defibrillation, Cardioversion, and Pacing Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-35 - IV-46. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M Sado and C. D Deakin How good is your defibrillation technique? J R Soc Med, January 1, 2005; 98(1): 3 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Samson, R. A. Berg, and R. Bingham Use of Automated External Defibrillators for Children: An Update--An Advisory Statement From the Pediatric Advanced Life Support Task Force, International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Pediatrics, July 1, 2003; 112(1): 163 - 168. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R.A. Samson, R.A. Berg, R. Bingham, D. Biarent, A. Coovadia, M.F. Hazinski, R.W. Hickey, V. Nadkarni, G. Nichol, J. Tibballs, et al. Use of Automated External Defibrillators for Children: An Update: An Advisory Statement From the Pediatric Advanced Life Support Task Force, International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Circulation, July 1, 2003; 107(25): 3250 - 3255. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Mittal, S. Ayati, K. M. Stein, D. Schwartzman, D. Cavlovich, P. J. Tchou, S. M. Markowitz, D. J. Slotwiner, M. A. Scheiner, and B. B. Lerman Transthoracic Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation : Comparison of Rectilinear Biphasic Versus Damped Sine Wave Monophasic Shocks Circulation, March 21, 2000; 101(11): 1282 - 1287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Mittal, S. Ayati, K. M. Stein, B. P. Knight, F. Morady, D. Schwartzman, D. Cavlovich, E. V. Platia, H. Calkins, P. J. Tchou, et al. Comparison of a novel rectilinear biphasic waveform with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1999; 34(5): 1595 - 1601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T P Mathew, A Moore, M McIntyre, M T Harbinson, N P S Campbell, A A J Adgey, and G W N Dalzell Randomised comparison of electrode positions for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation Heart, June 1, 1999; 81(6): 576 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				Advanced Life Support Working Group of the Europea The 1998 European Resuscitation Council guidelines for adult advanced life support BMJ, June 20, 1998; 316(7148): 1863 - 1869. [Full Text]

				Y. Yamanouchi, K. A. Mowrey, M. J. Niebauer, P. J. Tchou, and B. L. Wilkoff Additional Lead Improves Defibrillation Efficacy With an Abdominal `Hot Can' Electrode System Circulation, December 16, 1997; 96(12): 4400 - 4407. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				B. E. Gliner, T. E. Lyster, S. M. Dillion, and G. H. Bardy Transthoracic Defibrillation of Swine With Monophasic and Biphasic Waveforms Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1634 - 1643. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				Adult Advanced Cardiac Life Support JAMA, October 28, 1992; 268(16): 2199 - 2241. [Abstract] [PDF]