This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hossack, K. F. Articles by Dodge, H. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hossack, K. F. Articles by Dodge, H. T.

Circulation, Vol 70, 465-471, Copyright © 1984 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Diltiazem-induced blockade of sympathetically mediated constriction of normal and diseased coronary arteries: lack of epicardial coronary dilatory effect in humans

KF Hossack, BG Brown, DK Stewart and HT Dodge

To determine mechanisms of benefit from diltiazem, 13 patients with coronary disease performed sustained isometric handgrip exercise and repeated the procedure during intravenous infusion of diltiazem (0.25 mg/kg bolus followed by 0.003 mg/kg/min). Cardiovascular responses to handgrip, diltiazem, their combination, and nitroglycerin were assessed by hemodynamic and electrocardiographic measurements and by computer- assisted measurements of normal and diseased segments of epicardial coronary arteries. Handgrip produced increases in heart rate (12%; p less than .001), pulmonary arterial pressure (19%; p less than .005), and pulmonary wedge pressure (33%; p less than .005). Diltiazem produced significant reductions in heart rate (7%; p less than .05) and aortic pressure (14%; p less than .001). Pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary wedge pressure were unchanged by diltiazem. Diltiazem did not prevent the increase in heart rate or in aortic or wedge pressure associated with handgrip. Diltiazem prolonged atrioventricular conduction from 0.18 +/- 0.03 to 0.20 +/- 0.03 sec (p less than .001). Compared with control values, nitroglycerin reduced aortic pressure (14%; p less than .005), pulmonary arterial pressure (38%; p less than .001), and pulmonary wedge pressure (42%; p less than .005). Heart rate was unchanged. The constriction (20%) in lumen area of normal coronary arterial segments during handgrip was effectively prevented by infusion of diltiazem (1%; p less than .001). Nitroglycerin produced a significantly greater increase (20%) in diameter of normal coronary arterial segments than diltiazem (3%; p less than .001) and tended to have a more favorable effect than diltiazem on stenosis minimum area and flow resistance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. S. Lett, J. A. Blumenthal, M. A. Babyak, T. J. Strauman, C. Robins, and A. Sherwood Social Support and Coronary Heart Disease: Epidemiologic Evidence and Implications for Treatment Psychosom Med, November 1, 2005; 67(6): 869 - 878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. S. Lett, J. A. Blumenthal, M. A. Babyak, A. Sherwood, T. Strauman, C. Robins, and M. F. Newman Depression as a Risk Factor for Coronary Artery Disease: Evidence, Mechanisms, and Treatment Psychosom Med, May 1, 2004; 66(3): 305 - 315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. K. Julius, G. Vassalli, L. Mandinov, and O. M. Hess Alpha-adrenoceptor blockade prevents exercise-induced vasoconstriction of stenotic coronary arteries J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 1999; 33(6): 1499 - 1505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Nordlander, M. Pfaffendorf, and H. B. van Wezel Calcium Antagonists for Perioperative Blood Pressure Control Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 1998; 2(3): 231 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. E. Strauss and A. F. Parisi Combined Use of Calcium-Channel and Beta-Adrenergic Blockers for the Treatment of Chronic Stable Angina: Rationale, Efficacy, and Adverse Effects Ann Intern Med, October 1, 1988; 109(7): 570 - 581. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Emanuelsson, L. Ekstrom, A. Hjalmarson, C. Jonsteg, and D. Schlossman Felodipine-Induced Dilatation of Epicardial Coronary Arteries A Randomized, Double-Blind Study Angiology, January 1, 1986; 37(1): 1 - 7. [Abstract] [PDF]