Circulation, Vol 71, 158-164, Copyright © 1985 by American Heart Association
OA Smiseth, MA Frais, I Kingma, ER Smith and JV Tyberg
To determine the better method of measuring pericardial constraint,
pericardial pressure was recorded by a liquid-filled open-ended catheter
and a liquid-containing flat balloon in six open-chest anesthetized dogs.
Left ventricular pressure was measured by a micromanometer-tipped catheter
and left ventricular anteroposterior diameter was measured by
sonomicrometry. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was raised to 20
+/- 1.7 (mean +/- SD) mm Hg by intravenous saline. Left ventricular
diastolic pressure-diameter loops were constructed (1) with incremental
amounts of saline (0 to 50 ml) in the resealed pericardium, (2) with
several small holes in the pericardium, and (3) with the pericardium widely
open. Measured pericardial pressures were compared with what was assumed to
be the correct pericardial pressure, i.e., the calculated difference
between left ventricular diastolic pressure (at a given left ventricular
diameter) before and after opening the pericardium. Pressure recorded by
the flat balloon was similar to the calculated pericardial pressure at all
pericardial liquid volumes. Pressure recorded by the open-ended catheter,
however, was significantly lower (p less than .05) than the calculated
pressure unless there was at least 30 ml of liquid in the pericardium.
After several holes had been made in the pericardium it still exerted a
constraining effect, as shown by a marked rightward or downward shift of
the left ventricular diastolic pressure-diameter relationships after
completely opening the pericardium. After holes were made in the
pericardium pressure recorded by the flat balloon was still similar to the
calculated pericardial pressure. However, pressure recorded by the
open-ended catheter was significantly (p less than .02) lower than the
calculated pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
ARTICLES
Assessment of pericardial constraint in dogs
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. A. Gibbons Kroeker, S. Adeeb, J. V. Tyberg, and N. G. Shrive A 2D FE model of the heart demonstrates the role of the pericardium in ventricular deformation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): H2229 - H2236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Wang, F. Jalali, Y.-H. Sun, J.-J. Wang, K. H. Parker, and J. V. Tyberg Assessment of left ventricular diastolic suction in dogs using wave-intensity analysis Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): H1641 - H1651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.A. Bleasdale, M.S. Turner, C.E. Mumford, P. Steendijk, V. Paul, J.V. Tyberg, J.A. Morris-Thurgood, and M.P. Frenneaux Left Ventricular Pacing Minimizes Diastolic Ventricular Interaction, Allowing Improved Preload-Dependent Systolic Performance Circulation, October 19, 2004; 110(16): 2395 - 2400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Hamilton, R. Sas, and J. V. Tyberg Atrioventricular nonuniformity of pericardial constraint Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2004; 287(4): H1700 - H1704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H. Hollander, G. M. Dobson, J.-J. Wang, K. H. Parker, and J. V. Tyberg Direct and series transmission of left atrial pressure perturbations to the pulmonary artery: a study using wave-intensity analysis Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2004; 286(1): H267 - H275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-C. Fauchere, A. M. Walker, E. M. Skuza, and D. A. Grant Right atrial pressure as measure of ventricular constraint in newborn lambs Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2001; 280(6): H2740 - H2745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. deVries, D. R. Hamilton, H. E. D. J. Ter Keurs, R. Beyar, and J. V. Tyberg A novel technique for measurement of pericardial pressure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2001; 280(6): H2815 - H2822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Hamilton, G. Devries, and J. V. Tyberg Static and dynamic operating characteristics of a pericardial balloon J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2001; 90(4): 1481 - 1488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Tuck, J. C. Dort, M. E. Olson, and J. E. Remmers Monitoring respiratory function and sleep in the obese Vietnamese pot-bellied pig J Appl Physiol, July 1, 1999; 87(1): 444 - 451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Takata, Y. Harasawa, S. Beloucif, and J. L. Robotham Coupled vs. uncoupled pericardial constraint: effects on cardiac chamber interactions J Appl Physiol, December 1, 1997; 83(6): 1799 - 1813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Grant and A. M. Walker Pleural and Pericardial Pressures Limit Fetal Right Ventricular Output Circulation, August 1, 1996; 94(3): 555 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Y. Wang, R. S. Sheldon, D. W. Bergman, and J. V. Tyberg Effects of Pericardial Constraint on Left Ventricular Mechanoreceptor Activity in Cats Circulation, December 1, 1995; 92(11): 3331 - 3336. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1985 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |