Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1985;71:1146-1152

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wellens, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wellens, H. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Attack

Circulation, Vol 71, 1146-1152, Copyright © 1985 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Clinical, angiographic, and electrophysiologic findings in patients with aborted sudden death as compared with patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction

WG Stevenson, P Brugada, B Waldecker, M Zehender and HJ Wellens

After the acute phase of myocardial infarction, patients who develop sustained ventricular arrhythmias present with either sudden death or ventricular tachycardia (VT). Although current evidence suggests that VT frequently precedes ventricular fibrillation (VF) in patients presenting with sudden death, the factors resulting in rapid deterioration of VT to VF have not been delineated in humans. To determine whether left ventricular function, coronary anatomy, or electrophysiologic characteristics could differentiate patients with sudden death from those with VT without sudden death, we compared results of cardiac angiography and programmed electrical stimulation in 42 patients referred for evaluation of sustained VT or surviving "aborted" sudden death for more than 9 days after myocardial infarction. By univariate analysis there were no differences between patients with sudden death and those with VT in age, time from myocardial infarction to VT or sudden death, ejection fraction (0.31 +/- 0.12 vs 0.29 +/- 0.09), or the number of patients with a major area of contracting myocardium supplied by an artery with a 50% or greater or a 70% or greater stenosis (84% vs 64% and 68% vs 41%). Thirty-six percent of patients with sudden death but no patient with VT had two separate areas of infarction. During programmed electrical stimulation, a sustained ventricular arrhythmia was initiated in 100% of patients with VT and 73% of patients with sudden death and rapidly produced syncope in 67% of patients with sudden death but in only 5% of those with VT. This difference was due to the more frequent initiation of rapid polymorphic VT or VF (27% of patients) and to the shorter VT cycle length (242 +/- 31 vs 319 +/- 69 msec) when monomorphic VT was induced in the group with sudden death. No difference was found in the number of extrastimuli required for initiation of a sustained ventricular arrhythmia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
E.W. Lau, M.J. Griffith, R.K. Pathmanathan, G.A. Ng, M.M. Clune, J. Cooper, H.J. Marshall, P.R. Forsey, P.J. Stafford, R.G. Gray, et al.
The midlands trial of empirical amiodarone versus electrophysiology-guided interventions and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (MAVERIC): a multi-centre prospective randomised clinical trial on the secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death
Europace, January 1, 2004; 6(4): 257 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. Mont, M. Valentino, A. Sambola, M. Matas, L. Aguinaga, and J. Brugada
Arrhythmia recurrence in patients with a healed myocardial infarction who received an implantable defibrillator: analysis according to the clinical presentation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 1999; 34(2): 351 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. Ruppel, C. A. Schluter, S. Boczor, T. Meinertz, M. Schluter, K.-H. Kuck, and R. Cappato
Ventricular tachycardia during follow-up in patients resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation: experience from stored electrograms of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 1998; 32(6): 1724 - 1730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. R. R. Misier, T. Opthof, N. M. van Hemel, J. T. Vermeulen, J. M.T. de Bakker, J. J.A.M. Defauw, F. J.L. van Capelle, and M. J. Janse
Dispersion of `Refractoriness' in Noninfarcted Myocardium of Patients With Ventricular Tachycardia or Ventricular Fibrillation After Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, May 15, 1995; 91(10): 2566 - 2572.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. H. Raitt, G. L. Dolack, P. J. Kudenchuk, J. E. Poole, and G. H. Bardy
Ventricular Arrhythmias Detected After Transvenous Defibrillator Implantation in Patients With a Clinical History of Only Ventricular Fibrillation : Implications for Use of Implantable Defibrillator
Circulation, April 1, 1995; 91(7): 1996 - 2001.
[Abstract] [Full Text]