Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1985;71:1170-1178

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cannon, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cannon, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, M.

Circulation, Vol 71, 1170-1178, Copyright © 1985 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Hydraulic estimation of stenotic orifice area: a correction of the Gorlin formula

SR Cannon, KL Richards and M Crawford

To determine the source of errors in the Gorlin formula for estimating stenotic valvular orifice area, we used a pulsatile flow model that emulated left ventricular and aortic pressures and flow and allowed control of ventricular outflow orifice area. After comparing orifice areas calculated by the Gorlin formula with actual orifice areas, the Gorlin formula constant (k) was found to be highly correlated with the square root of the mean transvalvular gradient (r = .95). A new formula was derived empirically and predicted areas more accurately and with smaller standard errors than the Gorlin formula in the model (r = .98, SEE = 0.11 and r = .87, SEE = 0.28, respectively) in a series of 19 patients with Hancock porcine xenograft valves (r = .89, SEE = 0.07 and r = .60, SEE = 0.12, respectively) and in the original series of patients reported by Gorlin and Gorlin in proposing the Gorlin formula (r = .93, SEE = 0.11 and r = .91, SEE = 0.12, respectively).


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. A. Lange and L. D. Hillis
Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in Patients With Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis
Circulation, April 11, 2006; 113(14): 1718 - 1720.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. Chukwuemeka, V. Rao, S. Armstrong, J. Ivanov, and T. David
Aortic valve replacement: a safe and durable option in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 29(2): 133 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
W. C. Roberts and J. M. Ko
Relation of weights of operatively excised stenotic aortic valves to preoperative transvalvular peak systolic pressure gradients and to calculated aortic valve areas
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 2, 2004; 44(9): 1847 - 1855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
C Kupfahl, M Honold, G Meinhardt, H Vogelsberg, A Wagner, H Mahrholdt, and U Sechtem
Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques
Heart, August 1, 2004; 90(8): 893 - 901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. Garcia, J. G. Dumesnil, L.-G. Durand, L. Kadem, and P. Pibarot
Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon: practical implications with regard to quantification of aortic stenosis severity
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2003; 41(3): 435 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. Gilon, E. G. Cape, M. D. Handschumacher, J.-K. Song, J. Solheim, M. VanAuker, M. E. E. King, and R. A. Levine
Effect of three-dimensional valve shape on the hemodynamics of aortic stenosis: Three-dimensional echocardiographic stereolithography and patient studies
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 16, 2002; 40(8): 1479 - 1486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. A. Grayburn and E. J. Eichhorn
Dobutamine Challenge for Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis
Circulation, August 13, 2002; 106(7): 763 - 765.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. A. Nishimura, J. A. Grantham, H. M. Connolly, H. V. Schaff, S. T. Higano, and D. R. Holmes Jr
Low-Output, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis in Patients With Depressed Left Ventricular Systolic Function: The Clinical Utility of the Dobutamine Challenge in the Catheterization Laboratory
Circulation, August 13, 2002; 106(7): 809 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
E. Schwammenthal, Z. Vered, Y. Moshkowitz, B. Rabinowitz, Z. Ziskind, A. K. Smolinski, and M. S. Feinberg
Dobutamine Echocardiography in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Left Ventricular Dysfunction : Predicting Outcome as a Function of Management Strategy
Chest, June 1, 2001; 119(6): 1766 - 1777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
F ANTONINI-CANTERIN, P FAGGIANO, D ZANUTTINI, and F RIBICHINI
Is aortic valve resistance more clinically meaningful than valve area in aortic stenosis?
Heart, July 1, 1999; 82(1): 9 - 10.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
S Takeda, H Rimington, and J Chambers
The relation between transaortic pressure difference and flow during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis
Heart, July 1, 1999; 82(1): 11 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. H. Marcus, R. S. Heinrich, J. Bednarz, S. Lupovitch, J. Abruzzo, R. Borok, B. Vandenberg, R. E. Kerber, W. Piccione, A. P. Yoganathan, et al.
Assessment of Small-Diameter Aortic Mechanical Prostheses : Physiological Relevance of the Doppler Gradient, Utility of Flow Augmentation, and Limitations of Orifice Area Estimation
Circulation, September 1, 1998; 98(9): 866 - 872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. G. DeGroff, R. Shandas, and L. Valdes-Cruz
Analysis of the Effect of Flow Rate on the Doppler Continuity Equation for Stenotic Orifice Area Calculations : A Numerical Study
Circulation, April 28, 1998; 97(16): 1597 - 1605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. Gilon, E. G. Cape, M. D. Handschumacher, L. Jiang, C. Sears, J. Solheim, E. Morris, J. T. Strobel, S. M. Miller-Jones, A. E. Weyman, et al.
Insights From Three-dimensional Echocardiographic Laser Stereolithography: Effect of Leaflet Funnel Geometry on the Coefficient of Orifice Contraction, Pressure Loss, and the Gorlin Formula in Mitral Stenosis
Circulation, August 1, 1996; 94(3): 452 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
W. K. Laskey, W. G. Kussmaul, and A. Noordergraaf
Valvular and Systemic Arterial Hemodynamics in Aortic Valve Stenosis : A Model-Based Approach
Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1473 - 1478.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
W. Voelker, H. Reul, G. N. Ing, T. S. Ing, B. S. Ing, A. S. Ing, and K. R. Karsch
Comparison of Valvular Resistance, Stroke Work Loss, and Gorlin Valve Area for Quantification of Aortic Stenosis : An In Vitro Study in a Pulsatile Aortic Flow Model
Circulation, February 15, 1995; 91(4): 1196 - 1204.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
C. Veyrat, D. S. Beuve, Cl. Gourtchiglouian, S. Legeais, and D. Kalmanson
Quantification of Left-Sided Valvular Stenoses by Color Doppler Imaging of Jets
Angiology, May 1, 1990; 41(5): 352 - 364.
[Abstract] [PDF]