This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Touche, T. Articles by Gourgon, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Touche, T. Articles by Gourgon, R.

Circulation, Vol 72, 819-824, Copyright © 1985 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Assessment and follow-up of patients with aortic regurgitation by an updated Doppler echocardiographic measurement of the regurgitant fraction in the aortic arch

T Touche, R Prasquier, A Nitenberg, D de Zuttere and R Gourgon

The purpose of this study was to determine the value and limitations of an updated Doppler echocardiographic measurement of the aortic regurgitant fraction derived from the comparison of forward and reverse flows in the aortic arch. The method was based on the improvements in sampling and displaying Doppler frequencies and blood velocities provided by pulsed-emission, two-dimensional location, and spectral analysis and on an account for variations of aortic diameter through an M mode record of the aortic arch. Relevant statistical comparisons were performed between simultaneous noninvasive and invasive determinations of the regurgitant fraction in a group of 30 patients with aortic regurgitation (group I) and between simultaneous noninvasive and invasive measurements of variations of the regurgitant fraction induced by atrial pacing or vasodilator administration in 12 patients of this group. The two basal determinations were closely correlated (r = .90). The invasive regurgitant fraction ranged from 0% to 80%. The standard error of the Doppler estimate was 8.8% in group I as a whole and was only 6% in a subgroup of 20 patients with a high systolic aortic flow pattern, defined as both peak velocity above 0.8 m/sec and duration of systolic flow above 0.24 sec. This pattern was present in almost all (19/22) patients in whom the aortic regurgitation was more than moderate by invasive criterion (regurgitant fraction above 40%). The standard error of the Doppler estimate of variations of the regurgitant fraction was only 6.6%. Among 100 additional patients with aortic regurgitation (group II), only 12 had no pandiastolic reverse flow in the arch, and their regurgitation was always mild at aortographic examination.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Bekeredjian and P. A. Grayburn Valvular Heart Disease: Aortic Regurgitation Circulation, July 5, 2005; 112(1): 125 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Nash, E. Vitvitsky, J. Li, D. M. Cosgrove III, G. Pettersson, and R. A. Grimm Feasibility of Valve Repair for Regurgitant Bicuspid Aortic Valves--An Echocardiographic Study Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2005; 79(5): 1473 - 1479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. A. Zoghbi, M. Enriquez-Sarano, E. Foster, P. A. Grayburn, C. D. Kraft, R. A. Levine, P. Nihoyannopoulos, C. M. Otto, M. A. Quinones, H. Rakowski, et al. American Society of Echocardiography: recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography : A report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Nomenclature and Standards Committee and The Task Force on Valvular Regurgitation, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Echocardiography Committee, The Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, The American Heart Association, and the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Echocardiography, represented by: Eur J Echocardiogr, December 1, 2003; 4(4): 237 - 261. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S F de Marchi, S Windecker, B C Aeschbacher, and C Seiler Influence of left ventricular relaxation on the pressure half time of aortic regurgitation Heart, November 1, 1999; 82(5): 607 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. L. McDonald, R. C. Daly, H. V. Schaff, C. J. Mullany, F. A. Miller, J. J. Morris, and T. A. Orszulak Hemodynamic Performance of Small Aortic Valve Bioprostheses: Is There a Difference? Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1997; 63(2): 362 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D. C. Sutton, R. Kluger, S. U. Ahmed, S. C. Reimold, and J. B. Mark Flow reversal in the descending aorta: A guide to intraoperative assessment of aortic regurgitation with transesophageal echocardiography J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 1994; 108(3): 576 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text]