Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1985;72:1001-1007

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Betocchi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Rosing, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Betocchi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Rosing, D. R.

Circulation, Vol 72, 1001-1007, Copyright © 1985 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Effects of sublingual nifedipine on hemodynamics and systolic and diastolic function in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

S Betocchi, RO Cannon 3d, RM Watson, RO Bonow, HG Ostrow, SE Epstein and DR Rosing

The hemodynamic effects of sublingual nifedipine were examined in 36 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Twenty-one patients were initially given 20 mg and 15 patients were given 10 mg of the drug; 30 min after this first dose 26 patients received 10 mg and one patient 20 mg as a second dose. Hemodynamic findings in patients who received different doses of the drug were similar. Peak effects included an increase in heart rate from 79 +/- 12 to 91 +/- 14 (mean +/- 1 SD) beats/min (p less than .01), and a decrease in mean blood pressure from 89 +/- 12 to 77 +/- 10 mm Hg (p less than .01). Cardiac index increased after nifedipine (2.8 +/- 0.6 to 3.3 +/- 0.8 liters/min/m2; p less than .01); stroke volume index, however, did not change (36 +/- 7 to 36 +/- 8 ml/beat/m2; NS). Peripheral vascular resistance index fell significantly from 822 +/- 261 to 610 +/- 197 dynes X sec X cm-5 (p less than .01). Overall, left ventricular outflow tract gradient (LVOTG) did not change in patients with significant (greater than or equal to 30 mm Hg) basal LVOTG (75 +/- 22 to 83 +/- 22 mm Hg; NS), but it increased significantly in those six patients in whom peripheral vascular resistance fell by 25% or more (73 +/- 28 to 99 +/- 22 mm Hg; p less than .05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. A. Fifer and G. J. Vlahakes
Management of Symptoms in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Circulation, January 22, 2008; 117(3): 429 - 439.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. Spirito, C. E. Seidman, W. J. McKenna, and B. J. Maron
The Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
N. Engl. J. Med., March 13, 1997; 336(11): 775 - 785.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
B. Heric, B. W. Lytle, D. P. Miller, E. R. Rosenkranz, H. M. Lever, and D. M. Cosgrove
Surgical management of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy:Early and late results
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1995; 110(1): 195 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text]