Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1986;73:701-709

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stults, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kerber, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stults, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kerber, R. E.

Circulation, Vol 73, 701-709, Copyright © 1986 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Efficacy of an automated external defibrillator in the management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: validation of the diagnostic algorithm and initial clinical experience in a rural environment

KR Stults, DD Brown and RE Kerber

Automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) may have advantages over manual defibrillation in managing prehospital cardiac arrest, particularly in rural communities. We conducted a two-part evaluation of a commercially available AED. We first established the diagnostic accuracy of the AED's rhythm recognition algorithm by challenging it with 205 cardiac arrest rhythms previously recorded from actual patients in the field. The AED demonstrated 100% specificity and 92% sensitivity for ventricular fibrillation (VF) in this nonclinical setting. We then compared the clinical efficacy of AEDs in 18 small communities (study group) with that of manual defibrillation in 18 additional communities (control group) of similar size. Ambulance technicians using manual defibrillators correctly diagnosed VF more frequently than the AEDs (98% vs 83%; p less than .025). Specificity for VF was similar in the two groups (100% for AEDs vs 94% for technicians; p greater than .10). AEDs were able to deliver shocks more quickly than was possible with the manual defibrillators (1.56 vs 2.77 min; p less than .001). The ability of the AEDs to terminate VF was excellent, converting VF in 28 of 29 (97%) patients to some other rhythm compared with only 37 of 53 (70%) patients in the control group (p less than .01). Hospital admission and discharge rates were similar for the two groups. Ten of the 35 (29%) patients managed with AEDs achieved admission and six (17%) were ultimately discharged. In the control group 17 of 53 (33%) patients with VF were admitted and seven (13%) were discharged (p less than .75). AEDs are an effective alternative to manual defibrillation in small communities.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
M. P. Anstadt and J. E. Lowe
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 487 - 506.
[Full Text]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
M. P. Anstadt and J. E. Lowe
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 471 - 494.
[Full Text]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
T. S. Takata, R. L. Page, and J. A. Joglar
Automated External Defibrillators: Technical Considerations and Clinical Promise
Ann Intern Med, December 4, 2001; 135(11): 990 - 998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. P Pell, J. M Sirel, A. K Marsden, I. Ford, and S. M Cobbe
Effect of reducing ambulance response times on deaths from out of hospital cardiac arrest: cohort study
BMJ, June 9, 2001; 322(7299): 1385 - 1388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. P. Marenco, P. J. Wang, M. S. Link, M. K. Homoud, and N. A. M. Estes III
Improving Survival From Sudden Cardiac Arrest: The Role of the Automated External Defibrillator
JAMA, March 7, 2001; 285(9): 1193 - 1200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J Herlitz, E Andersson, A Bang, J Engdahl, M Holmberg, J lindqvist, B.W Karlson, and L Waagstein
Experiences from treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during 17 years in Goteborg
Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2000; 21(15): 1251 - 1258.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P.-Y. Gueugniaud, P. Mols, P. Goldstein, E. Pham, P.-Y. Dubien, C. Deweerdt, M. Vergnion, P. Petit, P. Carli, and The European Epinephrine Study Group
A Comparison of Repeated High Doses and Repeated Standard Doses of Epinephrine for Cardiac Arrest Outside the Hospital
N. Engl. J. Med., November 26, 1998; 339(22): 1595 - 1601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A A J Adgey and P W Johnston
Approaches to modern management of cardiac arrest
Heart, October 1, 1998; 80(4): 397 - 401.
[Full Text]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
D. L. Atkins, L. L. Hartley, and D. K. York
Accurate Recognition and Effective Treatment of Ventricular Fibrillation by Automated External Defibrillators in Adolescents
Pediatrics, March 1, 1998; 101(3): 393 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. J. Myerburg and A. Castellanos
Clinical Trials of Implantable Defibrillators
N. Engl. J. Med., November 27, 1997; 337(22): 1621 - 1623.
[Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
K. A Ballew
Recent advances: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
BMJ, May 17, 1997; 314(7092): 1462 - 1462.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. L. Weisfeldt, R. E. Kerber, R. P. McGoldrick, A. J. Moss, G. Nichol, J. P. Ornato, D. G. Palmer, B. Riegel, and S. C. Smith Jr
American Heart Association Report on the Public Access Defibrillation Conference December 8-10, 1994
Circulation, November 1, 1995; 92(9): 2740 - 2747.
[Full Text]