Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1986;73:1022-1028

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ideker, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ideker, R. E.

Circulation, Vol 73, 1022-1028, Copyright © 1986 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Comparison of the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of ventricular vulnerability

PS Chen, N Shibata, EG Dixon, RO Martin and RE Ideker

To examine the relationship between the defibrillation threshold and the strength of shocks that induce ventricular fibrillation during the vulnerable period, we determined the defibrillation threshold in 22 open-chest dogs using epicardial defibrillation electrodes with the cathode at the ventricular apex and the anode at the right atrium. We also determined whether there was an upper limit of shock strength that induces fibrillation in the vulnerable period by giving shocks of various energy through these same electrodes during the repolarization phase of paced rhythm. The above determinations were also made with the anode at the ventricular apex and the cathode at the right atrium in eight of the dogs and with the cathode at the ventricular apex and the anode at the left atrium in another eight of the dogs. In all dogs for all electrode configurations, there was an upper limit to the shock strength that induced ventricular fibrillation during the vulnerable period. Depending on the electrode combination, this upper limit of ventricular vulnerability either was not significantly different from or was slightly lower than the defibrillation threshold. The correlation coefficient between the two was highly significant for all three electrode configurations. These results support the hypothesis that successful defibrillation with epicardial electrodes requires a shock strength that reaches or exceeds the upper limit of ventricular vulnerability and that shocks slightly lower than the defibrillation threshold fail because they reinitiate ventricular fibrillation by stimulating portions of the myocardium during their vulnerable period.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
T. Ashihara, J. Constantino, and N. A. Trayanova
Tunnel Propagation of Postshock Activations as a Hypothesis for Fibrillation Induction and Isoelectric Window
Circ. Res., March 28, 2008; 102(6): 737 - 745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
C. M. Ripplinger, W. Li, J. Hadley, J. Chen, F. Rothenberg, R. Lombardi, S. A. Wickline, A. J. Marian, and I. R. Efimov
Enhanced Transmural Fiber Rotation and Connexin 43 Heterogeneity Are Associated With an Increased Upper Limit of Vulnerability in a Transgenic Rabbit Model of Human Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Circ. Res., November 9, 2007; 101(10): 1049 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G.-S. Hwang, H. Hayashi, L. Tang, M. Ogawa, H. Hernandez, A. Y. Tan, H. Li, H. S. Karagueuzian, J. N. Weiss, S.-F. Lin, et al.
Intracellular Calcium and Vulnerability to Fibrillation and Defibrillation in Langendorff-Perfused Rabbit Ventricles
Circulation, December 12, 2006; 114(24): 2595 - 2603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
N. Trayanova
Defibrillation of the heart: insights into mechanisms from modelling studies
Exp Physiol, March 1, 2006; 91(2): 323 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
L. Li, V. Nikolski, D. W. Wallick, I. R. Efimov, and Y. Cheng
Mechanisms of enhanced shock-induced arrhythmogenesis in the rabbit heart with healed myocardial infarction
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2005; 289(3): H1054 - H1068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
F. Qu, L. Li, V. P. Nikolski, V. Sharma, and I. R. Efimov
Mechanisms of superiority of ascending ramp waveforms: new insights into mechanisms of shock-induced vulnerability and defibrillation
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): H569 - H577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
B. Rodriguez, L. Li, J. C. Eason, I. R. Efimov, and N. A. Trayanova
Differences Between Left and Right Ventricular Chamber Geometry Affect Cardiac Vulnerability to Electric Shocks
Circ. Res., July 22, 2005; 97(2): 168 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
B. Rodriguez, B. M. Tice, J. C. Eason, F. Aguel, J. M. Ferrero Jr., and N. Trayanova
Effect of acute global ischemia on the upper limit of vulnerability: a simulation study
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2004; 286(6): H2078 - H2088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. Swerdlow, K. Shivkumar, and J. Zhang
Determination of the Upper Limit of Vulnerability Using Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Electrograms
Circulation, June 24, 2003; 107(24): 3028 - 3033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. J. Sims, K. L. Schoff, J. M. Loeb, and N. A. Wiegert
Regional gap junction inhibition increases defibrillation thresholds
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 5, 2003; 285(1): H10 - H16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. S. Link, B. J. Maron, P. J. Wang, B. A. VanderBrink, W. Zhu, and N. A. M. Estes III
Upper and lower limits of vulnerability to sudden arrhythmic death with chest-wall impact (commotio cordis)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2003; 41(1): 99 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
N. C. Wang, M.-H. Lee, T. Ohara, Y. Okuyama, G. A. Fishbein, S.-F. Lin, H. S. Karagueuzian, and P.-S. Chen
Optical Mapping of Ventricular Defibrillation in Isolated Swine Right Ventricles: Demonstration of a Postshock Isoelectric Window After Near-Threshold Defibrillation Shocks
Circulation, July 10, 2001; 104(2): 227 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
H. S Karagueuzian and P.-S. Chen
Cellular mechanism of reentry induced by a strong electrical stimulus: Implications for fibrillation and defibrillation
Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2001; 50(2): 251 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. L. Page, J. A. Joglar, R. C. Kowal, J. D. Zagrodzky, L. L. Nelson, K. Ramaswamy, S. J. Barbera, M. H. Hamdan, and D. K. McKenas
Use of Automated External Defibrillators by a U.S. Airline
N. Engl. J. Med., October 26, 2000; 343(17): 1210 - 1216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
L. Tung and A. G. Kleber
Virtual sources associated with linear and curved strands of cardiac cells
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2000; 279(4): H1579 - H1590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Huang, B. H. KenKnight, D. L. Rollins, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker
Ventricular Defibrillation With Triphasic Waveforms
Circulation, March 21, 2000; 101(11): 1324 - 1328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A Schuchert, M Kühl, R Rüppel, and T Meinertz
Induction of atrial fibrillation with rapid high voltage ventricular pacing for ventricular fibrillation conversion testing
Heart, February 1, 2000; 83(2): 178 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
R. Gradaus, D. Bocker, A. Dorszewski, B. Lamp, D. Hammel, G. Breithardt, and M. Block
Fractally coated defibrillation electrodes: Is an improvement in defibrillation threshold possible?
Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(2): 154 - 159.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
Y. Cheng, K. A. Mowrey, D. R. Van Wagoner, P. J. Tchou, and I. R. Efimov
Virtual Electrode-Induced Reexcitation : A Mechanism of Defibrillation
Circ. Res., November 26, 1999; 85(11): 1056 - 1066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Katz, R. J. Sweeney, R. M. Gill, P. R. Reid, and E. N. Prystowsky
Relation of Atrial Refractoriness to Upper and Lower Limits of Vulnerability for Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Following Implantable Ventricular Defibrillator Shocks
Circulation, September 7, 1999; 100(10): 1125 - 1130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. N. Schauerte, K. Ziegert, M. Waldmann, F. A. Schondube, F. Birkenhauer, K. Mischke, M. Grossmann, P. Hanrath, and C. Stellbrink
Effect of Biphasic Shock Duration on Defibrillation Threshold With Different Electrode Configurations and Phase 2 Capacitances : Prediction by Upper-Limit-of-Vulnerability Determination
Circulation, March 23, 1999; 99(11): 1516 - 1522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Windecker, R. E. Ideker, V. J. Plumb, G. N. Kay, G. P. Walcott, and A. E. Epstein
The influence of ventricular fibrillation duration on defibrillation efficacy using biphasic waveforms in humans
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 1999; 33(1): 33 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. S. Strobel, B. H. KenKnight, D. L. Rollins, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker
The effects of ventricular fibrillation duration and site of initiation on the defibrillation threshold during early ventricular fibrillation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 1998; 32(2): 521 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. B. White, G. P. Walcott, A. E. Pollard, and R. E. Ideker
Myocardial Discontinuities : A Substrate for Producing Virtual Electrodes That Directly Excite the Myocardium by Shocks
Circulation, May 5, 1998; 97(17): 1738 - 1745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
I. R. Efimov, Y. Cheng, D. R. Van Wagoner, T. Mazgalev, and P. J. Tchou
Virtual Electrode–Induced Phase Singularity : A Basic Mechanism of Defibrillation Failure
Circ. Res., May 4, 1998; 82(8): 918 - 925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
V. G. Fast, S. Rohr, A. M. Gillis, and A. G. Kleber
Activation of Cardiac Tissue by Extracellular Electrical Shocks : Formation of `Secondary Sources' at Intercellular Clefts in Monolayers of Cultured Myocytes
Circ. Res., February 23, 1998; 82(3): 375 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. C. Sokoloski, G. M. Ayers, K. Kumagai, C. M. Khrestian, S. Niwano, and A. L. Waldo
Safety of Transvenous Atrial Defibrillation : Studies in the Canine Sterile Pericarditis Model
Circulation, August 19, 1997; 96(4): 1343 - 1350.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Huang, B. H. KenKnight, G. P. Walcott, D. L. Rollins, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker
Effects of Transvenous Electrode Polarity and Waveform Duration on the Relationship Between Defibrillation Threshold and Upper Limit of Vulnerability
Circulation, August 19, 1997; 96(4): 1351 - 1359.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Gotoh, T. Uchida, W. J. Mandel, M. C. Fishbein, P.-S. Chen, and H. S. Karagueuzian
Cellular Graded Responses and Ventricular Vulnerability to Reentry by a Premature Stimulus in Isolated Canine Ventricle
Circulation, April 15, 1997; 95(8): 2141 - 2154.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Tomassoni, K. Newby, S. Deshpande, K. Axtell, J. Sra, M. Akhtar, and A. Natale
Defibrillation Efficacy of Commercially Available Biphasic Impulses in Humans : Importance of Negative-Phase Peak Voltage
Circulation, April 1, 1997; 95(7): 1822 - 1826.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. D. Swerdlow, C. T. Peter, R. M. Kass, E. S. Gang, W. J. Mandel, C. Hwang, D. J. Martin, and P.-S. Chen
Programming of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators on the Basis of the Upper Limit of Vulnerability
Circulation, March 18, 1997; 95(6): 1497 - 1504.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
K. F. Kwaku and S. M. Dillon
Shock-Induced Depolarization of Refractory Myocardium Prevents Wave-Front Propagation in Defibrillation
Circ. Res., November 1, 1996; 79(5): 957 - 973.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Behrens, C. Li, P. Kirchhof, F. L. Fabritz, and M. R. Franz
Reduced Arrhythmogenicity of Biphasic Versus Monophasic T-Wave Shocks: Implications for Defibrillation Efficacy
Circulation, October 15, 1996; 94(8): 1974 - 1980.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. L. Pinski and G. J. Fahy
The Proarrhythmic Potential of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators
Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1651 - 1664.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. A. Malkin, S. F. Idriss, R. G. Walker, and R. E. Ideker
Effect of Rapid Pacing and T-Wave Scanning on the Relation Between the Defibrillation and Upper-Limit-of-Vulnerability Dose-Response Curves
Circulation, September 1, 1995; 92(5): 1291 - 1299.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
C. Bonometti, C. Hwang, D. Hough, J. J. Lee, M. C. Fishbein, H. S. Karagueuzian, and P.-S. Chen
Interaction Between Strong Electrical Stimulation and Reentrant Wavefronts in Canine Ventricular Fibrillation
Circ. Res., August 1, 1995; 77(2): 407 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. J. Souza, R. A. Malkin, and R. E. Ideker
Comparison of Upper Limit of Vulnerability and Defibrillation Probability of Success Curves Using a Nonthoracotomy Lead System
Circulation, February 15, 1995; 91(4): 1247 - 1252.
[Abstract] [Full Text]