Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1986;73:1162-1174

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murakami, T.
Right arrow Articles by Krayenbuehl, H. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murakami, T.
Right arrow Articles by Krayenbuehl, H. P.

Circulation, Vol 73, 1162-1174, Copyright © 1986 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Diastolic filling dynamics in patients with aortic stenosis

T Murakami, OM Hess, JE Gage, J Grimm and HP Krayenbuehl

Left ventricular filling dynamics were investigated in 24 patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Biplane cineangiography was performed with simultaneous micromanometry in these 24 patients and in six control subjects. Twelve of the patients with AS had moderate hypertrophy with a left ventricular muscle mass index of less than 180 g/m2 (ASI group) and 12 had severe hypertrophy with an index of 180 g/m2 or more (AS2 group). Filling dynamics were also evaluated postoperatively in eight patients in the AS1 and six patients in the AS2 group. Preoperatively, end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indexes were larger and ejection fraction was lower in the AS2 compared with the control or AS1 group. Percent volume increase during the first half of diastole (%V1) was smaller in the AS1 than in the AS2 group. Peak filling rate in the first half of diastole (PFR 1) was higher in the AS2 than in the control or in AS1 group, while peak filling rate in the second half of diastole (PFR2) was considerably greater in the AS1 group than in the other two groups. The time constant of left ventricular pressure decline, an index of the rate of relaxation, was prolonged in the AS2 group. In contrast, mitral valve opening pressure (MVOP) was significantly higher in this group than in the other two groups. The constant of left ventricular chamber stiffness was slightly but not significantly greater in both AS groups than in the control subjects. After surgery in patients in the AS1 group, preoperatively reduced %V1 had increased and preoperatively enhanced PFR2 had decreased. In patients in the AS2 group, excluding one with a persistent low ejection fraction after surgery, preoperatively enhanced PFR1 decreased in association with a decrease in MVOP. Thus, left ventricular filling dynamics vary in patients with AS depending on the degree of left ventricular hypertrophy and systolic function. In patients with AS and moderate hypertrophy %V1 is slightly reduced but is compensated for by a forceful atrial contraction. In those with severe hypertrophy and systolic dysfunction increased driving pressure allows %V1 to remain within normal limits, despite prolonged left ventricular relaxation and decreased elastic recoil. Both changes in left ventricular filling dynamics tend to normalize after surgery in association with a reduction in left ventricular hypertrophy and/or an improvement of systolic function.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al.
ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): e1 - e148.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
G. K. Sharma, M. Wojtalik, A. Siwinska, B. Mrozinski, M. Pawelec-Wojtalik, R. Bartkowski, W. Mrowczynski, and O. Trojnarska
Aortoventriculoplasty and left ventricle function: long-term follow-up
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 26(1): 129 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
R. G. Fuster, J. A. M. Argudo, O. G. Albarova, F. H. Sos, S. C. Lopez, M. J. D. Sorli, M. B. Codoner, and J. A. B. Minano
Left ventricular mass index in aortic valve surgery: a new index for early valve replacement?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2003; 23(5): 696 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. J. Lamb, H. P. Beyerbacht, A. de Roos, A. van der Laarse, H. W. Vliegen, F. Leujes, J. J. Bax, and E. E. van der Wall
Left ventricular remodeling early after aortic valve replacement: differential effects on diastolic function in aortic valve stenosis and aortic regurgitation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 18, 2002; 40(12): 2182 - 2188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. H. Mehta, D. Bruckman, S. Das, T. Tsai, P. Russman, D. Karavite, H. Monaghan, S. Sonnad, M. J. Shea, K. A. Eagle, et al.
Implications of increased left ventricular mass index on in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2001; 122(5): 919 - 928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. P. Beyerbacht, H. J. Lamb, A. van der Laarse, H. W. Vliegen, F. Leujes, M. G. Hazekamp, A. de Roos, and E. E. van der Wall
Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Aortic Valve Stenosis Improves Myocardial Metabolism and Diastolic Function
Radiology, June 1, 2001; 219(3): 637 - 643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
E Nagel, M Stuber, B Burkhard, S.E Fischer, M.B Scheidegger, P Boesiger, and O.M Hess
Cardiac rotation and relaxation in patients with aortic valve stenosis
Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2000; 21(7): 582 - 589.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. Lauer, M. Schannwell, U. Kuhl, B.-E. Strauer, and H.-P. Schultheiss
Antimyosin autoantibodies are associated with deterioration of systolic and diastolic left ventricular function in patients with chronic myocarditis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2000; 35(1): 11 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. B. Hokken, A. H. Cromme-Dijkhuis, A. J. J. C. Bogers, S. E. C. Spitaels, M. Witsenburg, J. Hess, and E. Bos
Clinical Outcome and Left Ventricular Function After Pulmonary Autograft Implantation in Children
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1997; 63(6): 1713 - 1717.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. Villari, G. Vassalli, E. S. Monrad, M. Chiariello, M. Turina, and O. M. Hess
Normalization of Diastolic Dysfunction in Aortic Stenosis Late After Valve Replacement
Circulation, May 1, 1995; 91(9): 2353 - 2358.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
O. Lund and F. T. Jensen
Late Cardiac Deaths After Isolated Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis. Relation to Impaired Left Ventricular Diastolic Performance
Angiology, March 1, 1989; 40(3): 199 - 208.
[Abstract] [PDF]