Circulation, Vol 74, 205-214, Copyright © 1986 by American Heart Association
J Davis, T Matsubara, MM Scheinman, B Katzung and LH Hondeghem
Lidocaine is a commonly used antiarrhythmic drug that causes use- dependent
blockade of sodium channels in vitro and reduces conduction velocity in
vitro and in vivo. According to the modulated receptor hypothesis of
antiarrhythmic drug action, lidocaine has a low affinity for rested sodium
channels but a high affinity for open and inactivated channels. In the
present experiments, we characterized use-dependent conduction slowing and
recovery from slowing by lidocaine in anesthetized dogs. The
His-to-ventricular conduction interval was used as the indicator of
conduction velocity. We found that prolongation of conduction time was
greater as the stimulation frequency was increased. Moreover, on abruptly
changing the stimulation frequency, a new steady- state conduction time was
approached in two to three depolarizations. On discontinuation of
stimulation, the conduction time of progressively less premature
extrastimuli shortened exponentially with a terminal phase time constant of
152 +/- 115 msec. These effects by lidocaine were enhanced during acidosis
and enhancement was reversed by correction of the acidosis. It is concluded
that the effects in vivo of lidocaine on conduction under several
conditions of rate, rhythm, and pH are similar to its effects on the
maximum upstroke velocity of the action potential in vitro. Although these
experiments were not designed to validate the modulated receptor
hypothesis, it appears that the modulated receptor hypothesis can predict
the effects of lidocaine on conduction in vivo.
ARTICLES
Use-dependent effects of lidocaine on conduction in canine myocardium: application of the modulated receptor hypothesis in vivo
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Fei, D. Yazmajian, M. S. Hanna, and L. H. Frame Termination of Reentry by Lidocaine in the Tricuspid Ring In Vitro: Role of Cycle-Length Oscillation, Fast Use-Dependent Kinetics, and Fixed Block Circ. Res., February 1, 1997; 80(2): 242 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1986 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |