Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1986;74:205-214

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hondeghem, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davis, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hondeghem, L. H.

Circulation, Vol 74, 205-214, Copyright © 1986 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Use-dependent effects of lidocaine on conduction in canine myocardium: application of the modulated receptor hypothesis in vivo

J Davis, T Matsubara, MM Scheinman, B Katzung and LH Hondeghem

Lidocaine is a commonly used antiarrhythmic drug that causes use- dependent blockade of sodium channels in vitro and reduces conduction velocity in vitro and in vivo. According to the modulated receptor hypothesis of antiarrhythmic drug action, lidocaine has a low affinity for rested sodium channels but a high affinity for open and inactivated channels. In the present experiments, we characterized use-dependent conduction slowing and recovery from slowing by lidocaine in anesthetized dogs. The His-to-ventricular conduction interval was used as the indicator of conduction velocity. We found that prolongation of conduction time was greater as the stimulation frequency was increased. Moreover, on abruptly changing the stimulation frequency, a new steady- state conduction time was approached in two to three depolarizations. On discontinuation of stimulation, the conduction time of progressively less premature extrastimuli shortened exponentially with a terminal phase time constant of 152 +/- 115 msec. These effects by lidocaine were enhanced during acidosis and enhancement was reversed by correction of the acidosis. It is concluded that the effects in vivo of lidocaine on conduction under several conditions of rate, rhythm, and pH are similar to its effects on the maximum upstroke velocity of the action potential in vitro. Although these experiments were not designed to validate the modulated receptor hypothesis, it appears that the modulated receptor hypothesis can predict the effects of lidocaine on conduction in vivo.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
H. Fei, D. Yazmajian, M. S. Hanna, and L. H. Frame
Termination of Reentry by Lidocaine in the Tricuspid Ring In Vitro: Role of Cycle-Length Oscillation, Fast Use-Dependent Kinetics, and Fixed Block
Circ. Res., February 1, 1997; 80(2): 242 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text]