This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Marchlinski, F. E. Articles by Josephson, M. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Marchlinski, F. E. Articles by Josephson, M. E.

Circulation, Vol 74, 1037-1043, Copyright © 1986 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Amiodarone versus amiodarone and a type IA agent for treatment of patients with rapid ventricular tachycardia

FE Marchlinski, AE Buxton, JM Miller, JA Vassallo, BT Flores and ME Josephson

Induction of rapid ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation during therapy with amiodarone is associated with an increased risk of sudden death. To determine whether the addition of a type IA antiarrhythmic agent to therapy would improve outcome, 37 patients in whom ventricular tachyarrhythmia of a cycle length less than 350 msec was induced after 14 +/- 2 days of amiodarone were randomly assigned to therapy with amiodarone alone (group 1, 20 patients) or amiodarone plus type IA agent (group 2, 17 patients). Type IA therapy consisted of procainamide in 13 patients and quinidine in four procainamide-intolerant patients. To assess the short-term effects of a type IA agent on inducibility of ventricular tachyarrhythmia, cycle length, and hemodynamic tolerance, 16 of 20 patients in group 1 and all patients in group 2 underwent repeat programmed stimulation after the intravenous administration of procainamide during amiodarone therapy (mean procainamide serum concentration 7.2 +/- 2.0 micrograms/ml). Procainamide prevented induction of sustained arrhythmia in only two of 33 patients. Procainamide increased the cycle length of induced ventricular tachycardia from 283 +/- 30 to 352 +/- 46 msec (p less than .001). After the addition of procainamide, 16 of 31 patients vs 10 of 37 patients on amiodarone alone had an induced arrhythmia that was tolerated hemodynamically (p less than .05). There were no differences between groups 1 and 2 with respect to patient or arrhythmia characteristics, response to short-term procainamide, or duration of follow-up. The mean follow-up for all patients was 14 +/- 10 months.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Merot, F. Charpentier, J.-M. Poirier, G. Coutris, and J. Weissenburger Effects of chronic treatment by amiodarone on transmural heterogeneity of canine ventricular repolarization in vivo: interactions with acute sotalol Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 1999; 44(2): 303 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Sim, K. M. McDonald, P. W. Lavori, C. M. Norbutas, and M. A. Hlatky Quantitative Overview of Randomized Trials of Amiodarone to Prevent Sudden Cardiac Death Circulation, November 4, 1997; 96(9): 2823 - 2829. [Abstract] [Full Text]