Circulation, Vol 75, 1065-1073, Copyright © 1987 by American Heart Association
AK Bajaj, HA Kopelman, JP Wikswo Jr, F Cassidy, RL Woosley and DM Roden
Myocardial conduction depends on the magnitude of the fast inward sodium
current as well as on cardiac fiber orientation, with more rapid
propagation along myocardial fibers than across them. Although
antiarrhythmic drugs depress the sodium current in a frequency- dependent
fashion in vitro, their effects on conduction in the intact ventricle have
been less well studied. We therefore evaluated the frequency- and
orientation-dependent actions of mexiletine, quinidine, and their
combination on epicardial conduction in 24 pentobarbital- anesthetized
dogs. These interventions were chosen because the time constant of recovery
from sodium-channel blockade by mexiletine in vitro is shorter than that
from blockade by quinidine, and because we have previously shown that the
combination of these drugs is often clinically effective when single-agent
therapy fails. An electrode array that permitted measurement of conduction
times in multiple orientations over short segments of epicardium without
contamination by rapid Purkinje fiber propagation or by latency or virtual
cathode effects at the stimulus site was developed for these studies. In
all animals, the atrioventricular node was destroyed by injection of
formalin to permit measurements over a wide range of cycle lengths (250 to
1500 msec). In the absence of drugs, conduction in any direction was
frequency independent. In the presence of mexiletine, however,
frequency-dependent increases in conduction times were found at cycle
lengths of 600 msec or less; these changes were significantly greater in
orientations for which baseline conduction was rapid. Quinidine, on the
other hand, increased conduction times at all tested cycle lengths without
significant orientation-dependent effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
ARTICLES
Frequency- and orientation-dependent effects of mexiletine and quinidine on conduction in the intact dog heart
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. S. Spach, J. F. Heidlage, P. C. Dolber, and R. C. Barr Extracellular Discontinuities in Cardiac Muscle : Evidence for Capillary Effects on the Action Potential Foot Circ. Res., November 30, 1998; 83(11): 1144 - 1164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Daleau Effects of Antiarrhythmic Agents on Junctional Resistance of Guinea Pig Ventricular Cell Pairs J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 1998; 284(3): 1174 - 1179. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Grace and A. J. Camm Quinidine N. Engl. J. Med., January 1, 1998; 338(1): 35 - 45. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ranger and S. Nattel Determinants and Mechanisms of Flecainide-Induced Promotion of Ventricular Tachycardia in Anesthetized Dogs Circulation, September 1, 1995; 92(5): 1300 - 1311. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Restivo, H. Yin, E. B. Caref, A. I. Patel, G. Ndrepepa, M. J. Avitable, M. A. Assadi, N. Isber, and N. El-Sherif Reentrant Arrhythmias in the Subacute Infarction Period : The Proarrhythmic Effect of Flecainide Acetate on Functional Reentrant Circuits Circulation, February 15, 1995; 91(4): 1236 - 1246. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1987 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |