This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stratton, J. R. Articles by Halter, J. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stratton, J. R. Articles by Halter, J. B.

Circulation, Vol 75, 922-929, Copyright © 1987 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

The hemodynamic effects of sympathetic stimulation combined with parasympathetic blockade in man [published erratum appears in Circulation 1987 Oct;76(4):758]

JR Stratton, MA Pfeifer and JB Halter

To define the effects of circulating norepinephrine and epinephrine on cardiac function and to determine whether left ventricular function is influenced by parasympathetic mechanisms during catecholamine stimulation, hemodynamic changes were investigated in healthy young human subjects who were supine and awake during infusion of intravenous norepinephrine alone (125 ng/kg/min) (n = 6), norepinephrine (125 ng/kg/min) plus epinephrine (50 ng/kg/min) (n = 6), and norepinephrine plus epinephrine plus parasympathetic blockade induced by atropine (2 mg intravenously) (n = 5). Ejection fraction and changes in cardiac volumes were measured by radionuclide ventriculography. During the infusion of norepinephrine plus epinephrine, plasma norepinephrine increased from 358 +/- 35 to 1782 +/- 123 pg/ml (mean +/- SE) and plasma epinephrine increased from 31 +/- 5 to 355 +/- 90 pg/ml (both p less than .01 vs baseline). These increases in plasma catecholamines were associated with increases in the heart rate (58 +/- 3 to 67 +/- 2 beats/min, p = NS), systolic blood pressure (113 +/- 3 to 140 +/- 6 mm Hg, p less than .01), ejection fraction (0.64 +/- 0.02 to 0.72 +/- 0.02 ejection fraction units, p less than .01), stroke volume (+41 +/- 5%, p less than .01), and cardiac output (+54 +/- 8%, p less than .01), and a decrease in systemic vascular resistance (-31 +/- 3%, p less than .01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T Kawasaki, A Azuma, T Kuribayashi, T Taniguchi, S Asada, T Kamitani, S Kawasaki, H Matsubara, and H Sugihara Enhanced vagal modulation and exercise induced ischaemia of the inferoposterior myocardium Heart, March 1, 2006; 92(3): 325 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Stratton, W. C. Levy, J. H. Caldwell, A. Jacobson, J. May, D. Matsuoka, and K. Madden Effects of aging on cardiovascular responses to parasympathetic withdrawal J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 4, 2003; 41(11): 2077 - 2083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q. Yang, A. Sanbe, H. Osinska, T. E. Hewett, R. Klevitsky, and J. Robbins In Vivo Modeling of Myosin Binding Protein C Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Circ. Res., October 29, 1999; 85(9): 841 - 847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Mier, M. J. Turner, A. A. Ehsani, and R. J. Spina Cardiovascular adaptations to 10 days of cycle exercise J Appl Physiol, December 1, 1997; 83(6): 1900 - 1906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Le Guludec, A. Cohen-Solal, J. Delforge, N. Delahaye, A. Syrota, and P. Merlet Increased Myocardial Muscarinic Receptor Density in Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy : An In Vivo PET Study Circulation, November 18, 1997; 96(10): 3416 - 3422. [Abstract] [Full Text]