This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Miller, J. M. Articles by Josephson, M. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Miller, J. M. Articles by Josephson, M. E.

Circulation, Vol 75, 930-940, Copyright © 1987 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: studies on upper and lower 'common pathways'

JM Miller, ME Rosenthal, JA Vassallo and ME Josephson

Electrophysiologic studies were performed in 28 patients with documented atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) to investigate the presence of AV nodal tissue situated between the tachycardia circuit and both the atrium (upper common pathway, UCP) and the His bundle (lower common pathway, LCP). All patients demonstrated a 1:1 AV relationship during SVT. The study protocol consisted of atrial then ventricular pacing at the SVT cycle length. UCPs were manifested in eight of 28 (29%) patients by either antegrade AV Wenckebach (six patients) or a paced atrium-His (AH) interval exceeding the AH in SVT (two patients, differences 5 and 9 msec). LCPs were manifested in 21 of 28 (75%) patients by either retrograde Wenckebach periodicity (two patients) or a paced HA interval exceeding the HA in SVT (19 patients, mean difference 25 +/- 20 msec). By these criteria, eight patients (29%) had evidence for both UCPs and LCPs. UCPs were more likely than LCPs to be manifested by Wenckebach criteria (p less than .05). Thus the AV nodal reentrant SVT circuit appears to be intranodal and is frequently surrounded by AV nodal tissue (UCP and LCP), antegrade and retrograde conduction properties of these common pathways are discordant in some cases, and conduction properties of UCP tissue differ from those of LCP tissue. These findings may have relevance in that the UCP or LCP may limit the ability of premature extrastimuli to penetrate the circuit to initiate or terminate AV nodal SVT.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Yamada, J. F. Huizar, H. T. McElderry, and G. N. Kay Atrial tachycardia with slow pathway conduction mimicking typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia Europace, May 1, 2007; 9(5): 299 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. G Katritsis and A. J. Camm Classification and differential diagnosis of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia. Europace, January 1, 2006; 8(1): 29 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Heidbüchel and W. M. Jackman Characterization of subforms of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia Europace, January 1, 2004; 6(4): 316 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Yamabe, I. Misumi, H. Fukushima, K. Ueno, Y. Kimura, and Y. Hokamura Electrophysiological Delineation of the Tachycardia Circuit in Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Circulation, August 10, 1999; 100(6): 621 - 627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W.-T. Lai, C.-S. Lee, S.-H. Sheu, Y.-S. Hwang, and R. J. Sung Electrophysiological Manifestations of the Excitable Gap of Slow-Fast AV Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Demonstrated by Single Extrastimulation Circulation, July 1, 1995; 92(1): 66 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text]