This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Feiring, A. J. Articles by White, C. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Feiring, A. J. Articles by White, C. W.

Circulation, Vol 75, 980-987, Copyright © 1987 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

The importance of the determination of the myocardial area at risk in the evaluation of the outcome of acute myocardial infarction in patients

AJ Feiring, MR Johnson, JM Kioschos, PT Kirchner, ML Marcus and CW White

On the basis of animal studies, we postulated that the size of the perfusion field (risk area) of an occluded coronary artery would be an important determinant of outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction. To test this hypothesis, we measured size of the risk area in 27 patients with acute myocardial infarction by the intracoronary injection of 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin and gated nuclear imaging. After injection of the albumin spheres (5.3 +/- 1.4 hr after the onset of chest pain) streptokinase was administered and in 16 of 27 patients (59%) effective thrombolysis was achieved. Since none of the patients had evidence of a prior acute myocardial infarction, the 3 day nuclear left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was considered an index of infarct size. Response to thrombolysis was analyzed according to success or failure of reperfusion and the size of the risk area (small risk area less than 25%, large risk area greater than 25% of left ventricular surface area). Standard clinical indexes correlated poorly with size of the risk area: electrocardiographic variables (r = .37), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (r = .23), cardiac index (r = .55), and the LVEF obtained from a right anterior oblique contrast ventriculogram (r = .31). The coronary vessel responsible for the acute myocardial infarction significantly influenced size of the risk area (left anterior descending, 38 +/- 5% [mean +/- SD] vs circumflex or right coronary artery, 17 +/- 4%). However, knowledge of the site of coronary occlusion within a vessel was not helpful in predicting the size of the area at risk.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P Elsman, A.W.J van `t Hof, M.J de Boer, J.C.A Hoorntje, H Suryapranata, J.H.E Dambrink, F Zijlstra, and on behalf of the Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Stud Role of collateral circulation in the acute phase of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary intervention Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2004; 25(10): 854 - 858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Sechtem Imaging myocardial area at risk and final infarct size Eur. Heart J. Suppl., June 1, 2001; 3(suppl_C): C36 - C46. [PDF]

				P Chareonthaitawee, R J Gibbons, R S Roberts, T F Christian, and R Burns The impact of time to thrombolytic treatment on outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction Heart, August 1, 2000; 84(2): 142 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Garcia, J. Elizaga, N. Perez-Castellano, J. A. Serrano, J. Soriano, M. Abeytua, J. Botas, R. Rubio, E. Lopez de Sa, J. L. Lopez-Sendon, et al. Primary angioplasty versus systemic thrombolysis in anterior myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 1, 1999; 33(3): 605 - 611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. W. White Simplicity's Virtue Scorned : Precision Comes to TIMI Flow Grading and the Results Are . . . Surprising Circulation, March 1, 1996; 93(5): 853 - 856. [Full Text]