This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smiseth, O. A. Articles by Tyberg, J. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smiseth, O. A. Articles by Tyberg, J. V.

Circulation, Vol 75, 1229-1236, Copyright © 1987 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Nonuniformity of pericardial surface pressure in dogs

OA Smiseth, NW Scott-Douglas, CR Thompson, ER Smith and JV Tyberg

Previously, we have shown that pericardial constraint cannot be measured by true (hydrostatic) pressure except when an excess of pericardial fluid is present and that a device such as a balloon (which reflects radial contact stress as well as hydrostatic pressure) must be used. Since radial contact stress is the major component of the constraint exerted by the pericardium when little pericardial liquid is present, it follows that the pressure measured by the balloon might be different over different parts of the heart. In an attempt to test this hypothesis, in 11 anesthetized dogs we placed pericardial balloons over the right and left ventricular free walls, instrumented the animals to measure ventricular dimensions (sonomicrometry) and pressure, mounted pneumatic constrictors on the aortic and pulmonary artery, reapproximated the pericardium, and closed the chest under suction. We studied the transient effects of constrictions of the ascending aorta and pulmonary artery and of angiotensin infusion before and after intravenous saline infusion. Aortic constriction and, to a lesser degree, angiotensin increased pericardial pressure over the left ventricle more than over the right ventricle. Pulmonary artery occlusion increased pericardial pressure over the right ventricle but significantly decreased pericardial pressure over the left ventricle. We conclude that there are significant local differences in pericardial pressure (recorded by balloon) over the lateral ventricular surfaces during acute changes in afterload. These observations may be explained in part by decreased venous return to the contralateral ventricle, the tendency of the heart to resist lateral displacement, and the limited mobility of the pericardium.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. R. Mitchell, W. A. Whitelaw, R. Sas, E. R. Smith, J. V. Tyberg, and I. Belenkie RV filling modulates LV function by direct ventricular interaction during mechanical ventilation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): H549 - H557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Belenkie, R. Sas, J. Mitchell, E. R. Smith, and J. V. Tyberg Opening the pericardium during pulmonary artery constriction improves cardiac function J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2004; 96(3): 917 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. deVries, D. R. Hamilton, H. E. D. J. Ter Keurs, R. Beyar, and J. V. Tyberg A novel technique for measurement of pericardial pressure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2001; 280(6): H2815 - H2822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Baker, R. Dani, E. R. Smith, J. V. Tyberg, and I. Belenkie Quantitative assessment of independent contributions of pericardium and septum to direct ventricular interaction Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 1998; 275(2): H476 - H483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]