Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1987;75:1281-1286

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanborn, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Faxon, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sanborn, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Faxon, D. P.

Circulation, Vol 75, 1281-1286, Copyright © 1987 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Angiographic and histologic consequences of laser thermal angioplasty: comparison with balloon angioplasty

TA Sanborn, CC Haudenschild, GR Garber, TJ Ryan and DP Faxon

The angiographic and histologic consequences of laser thermal angioplasty were examined and compared with those of conventional balloon angioplasty in an atherosclerotic rabbit iliac artery preparation immediately and 4 weeks after the procedure. Nineteen vessels in 13 rabbits underwent either laser thermal or balloon angioplasty in random order. Laser thermal angioplasty was performed in a total of nine vessels with either a 1.5 or 2.0 mm laser-heated metallic-capped fiber by delivery of 6 or 8 W, respectively, of argon laser energy for 5 sec duration during continuous advancement through the stenosis. Balloon angioplasty was performed in a total of 10 stenotic lesions with a 2.5 mm balloon catheter. The immediate enlargement of the angiographic luminal diameters was similar for both procedures: from 1.0 +/- 0.2 to 1.9 +/- 0.2 mm for laser thermal angioplasty vs 1.0 +/- 0.1 to 2.0 +/- 0.2 mm for balloon angioplasty. However, 4 weeks later the vessels treated with laser thermal angioplasty had less restenosis, defined as a 20% or greater reduction in luminal diameter (two of nine vessels [22%] vs 10 of 10 vessels [100%]; p less than .001), and a significantly larger mean luminal diameter (1.6 +/- 0.5 vs 1.0 +/- 0.4 mm) than those treated with conventional balloon angioplasty (p less than .02). Histologic examination 4 weeks after the procedure revealed less fibrocellular proliferation after laser thermal angioplasty, whereas those vessels treated with balloon angioplasty demonstrated evidence of prior fracture and dissection of the vessel wall with more of a fibrocellular proliferative response.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
A. Visona, G. Liessi, A. Bonanome, L. Lusiani, L. Miserocchi, G. Breggion, and A. Pagnan
Percutaneous Laser Angioplasty of Peripheral Vessels: Primary Success and Follow-up Results
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, October 1, 1992; 26(8): 622 - 629.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
S. R. Mohan, R.J. Hawker, A.P. Wolinski, J.A. Dunham, R.P. Grimley, and R. Downing
Platelet Accumulation After Laser Angioplasty A Scintigraphic Assessment
Angiology, January 1, 1992; 43(1): 11 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
W. J. Drasler, M. L. Jenson, G. J. Wilson, J. M. Thielen, E. I. Protonotarios, R. G. Dutcher, and Z. C. Possis
A Rheolytic System for Percutaneous Coronary and Peripheral Plaque Removal
Angiology, February 1, 1991; 42(2): 90 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
E. B. Diethrich, E. Timbadia, and I. Bahadir
Complications of Laser-Assisted Angioplasty: Recognition, Classification and Treatment
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, April 1, 1990; 24(3): 167 - 178.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
E. B. Diethrich, E. Timbadia, and I. Bahadir
Evaluation of a Partial Open Beam Laser Probe in Laser-Assisted Angioplasty
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, March 1, 1990; 24(2): 112 - 120.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
T. A. Sanborn, D. C. Cumberland, A. J. Greenfield, A. Motarjeme, D. E. Schwarten, D. R. Leachman, E. J. Ferris, R. K. Myler, T. C. McCowan, D. Tatpati, et al.
Peripheral Laser-Assisted Balloon Angioplasty: Initial Multicenter Experience in 219 Peripheral Arteries
Arch Surg, September 1, 1989; 124(9): 1099 - 1103.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
E. B. Diethrich, E. Timbadia, I. Bahadir, S. Carroll, S. Zenzen, and K. Coburn
Intraoperative Coronary Laser Recanalization: Evaluation of Safety in Ten Patients
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, September 1, 1988; 22(5): 335 - 343.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
W. S. Yamanashi, N. A. Yassa, D. L. Hill, J. E. Lewis, A. A. Patil, and P. D. Lester
Electromagnetic Field Focusing Probe (EFFP) A New Angioplasty Tool
Angiology, January 1, 1988; 39(12): 1014 - 1021.
[Abstract] [PDF]