Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1987;76:786-791

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rubinstein, R. I.
Right arrow Articles by Helfant, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rubinstein, R. I.
Right arrow Articles by Helfant, R. H.

Circulation, Vol 76, 786-791, Copyright © 1987 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate patency of aortocoronary bypass grafts

RI Rubinstein, AD Askenase, D Thickman, MS Feldman, JB Agarwal and RH Helfant
Philadelphia Heart Institute, Division of Cardiology, Presbyterian- University of Pennsylvania Medical Center 19104.

To assess the efficacy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in evaluating graft patency after coronary bypass surgery, 20 patients who had prior surgery (average 5.5 years, range 1.5 to 14) and recent cardiac catheterization because of chest pain were studied. No patient had surgical intervention or change in symptoms in the time interval between catheterization and MR imaging. These 20 patients had a total of 47 grafts, defined as proximal anastomoses: 20 to the left anterior descending or diagonal artery (LAD), 13 to the left circumflex artery marginal branches (LCX), and 14 to the right coronary artery or posterior descending artery (RCA). The patients underwent cardiac and respiratory gated MR scans in a 0.5 tesla magnet with an echo time of 22 msec and two repetitions in a 128 X 256 matrix. In-plane resolution was 2.7 mm. Every patient had a scan in the transaxial plane and some underwent scanning in the sagittal and coronal planes as well. A graft was considered patent by MR when a signal-free lumen was visualized in an anatomic position consistent with that of a bypass graft, had a lumen larger than the native vessels, was seen on more than one slice, and was seen at a level higher than that of the native vessels. If a known graft was not seen it was considered occluded. The scans were interpreted by consensus of two physicians aware of the operative but not the cardiac catheterization data.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. A. Bluemke, S. Achenbach, M. Budoff, T. C. Gerber, B. Gersh, L. D. Hillis, W. G. Hundley, W. J. Manning, B. F. Printz, M. Stuber, et al.
Noninvasive Coronary Artery Imaging: Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young
Circulation, July 29, 2008; 118(5): 586 - 606.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N I Stauder, B Klumpp, H Stauder, G Blumenstock, M Fenchel, A Kuttner, C D Claussen, and S Miller
Assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts by magnetic resonance imaging
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2007; 80(960): 975 - 983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
T. Wittlinger, O. Dzemali, I. Martinovic, and A. Moritz
Assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts patency with different magnetic resonance technologies.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 30(3): 436 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. Karski, G. Djaiani, J. Carroll, M. Iwanochko, P. Seneviratne, P. Liu, W. Kucharczyk, L. Fedorko, T. David, and D. Cheng
Tranexamic acid and early saphenous vein graft patency in conventional coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2005; 130(2): 309 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N I Stauder, A M Scheule, U Hahn, M Fenchel, F S Eckstein, U Kramer, C D Claussen, and S Miller
Perioperative monitoring of flow and patency in native and grafted internal mammary arteries using a combined MR protocol
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2005; 78(928): 292 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
N. I. Stauder, M. Fenchel, H. Stauder, A. Kuttner, A. M. Scheule, U. Kramer, C. D. Claussen, and S. Miller
Assessment of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting of the left internal thoracic artery by means of magnetic resonance imaging
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2005; 129(3): 607 - 614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. H. Bunce, C. H. Lorenz, A. S. John, J. R. Lesser, R. H. Mohiaddin, and D. J. Pennell
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patency: Assessment with True Fast Imaging with Steady-State Precession versus Gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography
Radiology, May 1, 2003; 227(2): 440 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. E. Langerak, H. W. Vliegen, J. W. Jukema, P. Kunz, A. H. Zwinderman, H. J. Lamb, E. E. van der Wall, and A. de Roos
Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Noninvasive Detection of Stenosis in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts and Recipient Coronary Arteries
Circulation, March 25, 2003; 107(11): 1502 - 1508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
W. L. F. Bedaux, M. B. M. Hofman, S. L. A. Vyt, J. G. F. Bronzwaer, C. A. Visser, and A. C. van Rossum
Assessment of coronary artery bypass graft disease using cardiovascular magnetic resonance determination of flow reserve
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 20, 2002; 40(10): 1848 - 1855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. E. Langerak, H. W. Vliegen, A. de Roos, A. H. Zwinderman, J. W. Jukema, P. Kunz, H. J. Lamb, and E. E. van der Wall
Detection of Vein Graft Disease Using High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Circulation, January 22, 2002; 105(3): 328 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. K. Yucel, C. M. Anderson, R. R. Edelman, T. M. Grist, R. A. Baum, W. J. Manning, A. Culebras, and W. Pearce
Magnetic Resonance Angiography : Update on Applications for Extracranial Arteries
Circulation, November 30, 1999; 100(22): 2284 - 2301.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
B. H. Walpoth, M. F. Muller, I. Genyk, B. Aeschbacher, B. Kipfer, U. Althaus, and T. P. Carrel
Evaluation of coronary bypass flow with color-Doppler and magnetic resonance imaging techniques: comparison with intraoperative flow measurements
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 1999; 15(6): 795 - 802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
P. Brenner, B. Wintersperger, A. von Smekal, V. Agirov, D. Bohm, E. Kreuzer, M. Reiser, and B. Reichart
Detection of coronary artery bypass graft patency by contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 1999; 15(4): 389 - 393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. A. Galjee, A. C. van Rossum, T. Doesburg, M. J. van Eenige, and C. A. Visser
Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessing Patency and Function of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts : An Angiographically Controlled Study
Circulation, February 15, 1996; 93(4): 660 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. E. van der Wall, H. W. Vliegen, A. de Roos, and A. V.G. Bruschke
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease
Circulation, November 1, 1995; 92(9): 2723 - 2739.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
R. M. MacMillan, J. Ivanoff, M. Tulchinsky, and K. Chandrasekaran
Clinical Application of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Heart and Great Vessels
Angiology, September 1, 1992; 43(9): 709 - 719.
[Abstract] [PDF]