Circulation, Vol 76, 786-791, Copyright © 1987 by American Heart Association
RI Rubinstein, AD Askenase, D Thickman, MS Feldman, JB Agarwal and RH Helfant
To assess the efficacy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in evaluating
graft patency after coronary bypass surgery, 20 patients who had prior
surgery (average 5.5 years, range 1.5 to 14) and recent cardiac
catheterization because of chest pain were studied. No patient had surgical
intervention or change in symptoms in the time interval between
catheterization and MR imaging. These 20 patients had a total of 47 grafts,
defined as proximal anastomoses: 20 to the left anterior descending or
diagonal artery (LAD), 13 to the left circumflex artery marginal branches
(LCX), and 14 to the right coronary artery or posterior descending artery
(RCA). The patients underwent cardiac and respiratory gated MR scans in a
0.5 tesla magnet with an echo time of 22 msec and two repetitions in a 128
X 256 matrix. In-plane resolution was 2.7 mm. Every patient had a scan in
the transaxial plane and some underwent scanning in the sagittal and
coronal planes as well. A graft was considered patent by MR when a
signal-free lumen was visualized in an anatomic position consistent with
that of a bypass graft, had a lumen larger than the native vessels, was
seen on more than one slice, and was seen at a level higher than that of
the native vessels. If a known graft was not seen it was considered
occluded. The scans were interpreted by consensus of two physicians aware
of the operative but not the cardiac catheterization data.(ABSTRACT
TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
ARTICLES
Magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate patency of aortocoronary bypass grafts
Philadelphia Heart Institute, Division of Cardiology, Presbyterian- University of Pennsylvania Medical Center 19104.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. A. Bluemke, S. Achenbach, M. Budoff, T. C. Gerber, B. Gersh, L. D. Hillis, W. G. Hundley, W. J. Manning, B. F. Printz, M. Stuber, et al. Noninvasive Coronary Artery Imaging: Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young Circulation, July 29, 2008; 118(5): 586 - 606. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N I Stauder, B Klumpp, H Stauder, G Blumenstock, M Fenchel, A Kuttner, C D Claussen, and S Miller Assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts by magnetic resonance imaging Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2007; 80(960): 975 - 983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Wittlinger, O. Dzemali, I. Martinovic, and A. Moritz Assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts patency with different magnetic resonance technologies. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 30(3): 436 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Karski, G. Djaiani, J. Carroll, M. Iwanochko, P. Seneviratne, P. Liu, W. Kucharczyk, L. Fedorko, T. David, and D. Cheng Tranexamic acid and early saphenous vein graft patency in conventional coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2005; 130(2): 309 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N I Stauder, A M Scheule, U Hahn, M Fenchel, F S Eckstein, U Kramer, C D Claussen, and S Miller Perioperative monitoring of flow and patency in native and grafted internal mammary arteries using a combined MR protocol Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2005; 78(928): 292 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. I. Stauder, M. Fenchel, H. Stauder, A. Kuttner, A. M. Scheule, U. Kramer, C. D. Claussen, and S. Miller Assessment of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting of the left internal thoracic artery by means of magnetic resonance imaging J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2005; 129(3): 607 - 614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. H. Bunce, C. H. Lorenz, A. S. John, J. R. Lesser, R. H. Mohiaddin, and D. J. Pennell Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patency: Assessment with True Fast Imaging with Steady-State Precession versus Gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography Radiology, May 1, 2003; 227(2): 440 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Langerak, H. W. Vliegen, J. W. Jukema, P. Kunz, A. H. Zwinderman, H. J. Lamb, E. E. van der Wall, and A. de Roos Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Noninvasive Detection of Stenosis in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts and Recipient Coronary Arteries Circulation, March 25, 2003; 107(11): 1502 - 1508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. L. F. Bedaux, M. B. M. Hofman, S. L. A. Vyt, J. G. F. Bronzwaer, C. A. Visser, and A. C. van Rossum Assessment of coronary artery bypass graft disease using cardiovascular magnetic resonance determination of flow reserve J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 20, 2002; 40(10): 1848 - 1855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Langerak, H. W. Vliegen, A. de Roos, A. H. Zwinderman, J. W. Jukema, P. Kunz, H. J. Lamb, and E. E. van der Wall Detection of Vein Graft Disease Using High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Angiography Circulation, January 22, 2002; 105(3): 328 - 333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Yucel, C. M. Anderson, R. R. Edelman, T. M. Grist, R. A. Baum, W. J. Manning, A. Culebras, and W. Pearce Magnetic Resonance Angiography : Update on Applications for Extracranial Arteries Circulation, November 30, 1999; 100(22): 2284 - 2301. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. H. Walpoth, M. F. Muller, I. Genyk, B. Aeschbacher, B. Kipfer, U. Althaus, and T. P. Carrel Evaluation of coronary bypass flow with color-Doppler and magnetic resonance imaging techniques: comparison with intraoperative flow measurements Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 1999; 15(6): 795 - 802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Brenner, B. Wintersperger, A. von Smekal, V. Agirov, D. Bohm, E. Kreuzer, M. Reiser, and B. Reichart Detection of coronary artery bypass graft patency by contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 1999; 15(4): 389 - 393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Galjee, A. C. van Rossum, T. Doesburg, M. J. van Eenige, and C. A. Visser Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessing Patency and Function of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts : An Angiographically Controlled Study Circulation, February 15, 1996; 93(4): 660 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. E. van der Wall, H. W. Vliegen, A. de Roos, and A. V.G. Bruschke Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease Circulation, November 1, 1995; 92(9): 2723 - 2739. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. MacMillan, J. Ivanoff, M. Tulchinsky, and K. Chandrasekaran Clinical Application of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Heart and Great Vessels Angiology, September 1, 1992; 43(9): 709 - 719. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1987 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |