Circulation, Vol 76, 792-801, Copyright © 1987 by American Heart Association
DC Redd, GS Roubin, PP Leimgruber, P Abi-Mansour, JS Douglas Jr and SB King 3d
The transstenotic pressure gradient recorded during coronary angioplasty
(PTCA) reflects the dynamic relationship that exists between coronary blood
flow and the effective cross-sectional area of the arterial lumen. An
apparent relationship between the dynamic behavior of the pressure gradient
and subsequent acute vessel closure was observed in our catheterization
laboratory. We therefore examined the usefulness of the pressure gradient
trend in predicting acute complications after 463 attempted PTCA
procedures. Two pressure gradient trend patterns were identified: (1) a
rising trend pattern identified by an increasing pressure gradient in the
interval after deflation of the angioplasty, and (2) a stable trend pattern
identified by a constant or decreasing pressure gradient. The incidence of
acute vessel closure (17% vs 4%, p = .0001), emergency CABG (5.6% versus
1%, p less than .05), and myocardial infarction (13% versus 2%, p less than
.0001) after the PTCA procedure was significantly higher among patients
with rising trend patterns when compared with patients with stable trend
patterns. Multivariate analysis identified independent predictors for an
acute closure event as rising trend pattern (p less than .001), post-PTCA
gradient (p less than .05), and post-PTCA percent diameter stenosis (p less
than .02). Independent predictors for emergency coronary artery bypass
grafting and myocardial infarction were post- PTCA gradient (p less than
.001) and a rising trend pattern (odds ratio = 2.91, p less than .001),
respectively. The dynamic behavior of the gradient trend provides
additional useful information about the results of dilatation.(ABSTRACT
TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
ARTICLES
The transstenotic pressure gradient trend as a predictor of acute complications after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
Andreas Gruentzig Cardiovascular Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. S. Roy, R. K. Banerjee, L. H. Back, M. R. Back, S. Khoury, and R. W. Millard Delineating the guide-wire flow obstruction effect in assessment of fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve measurements Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): H392 - H397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Popma and G. J. Dehmer Care of the Patient after Coronary Angioplasty Ann Intern Med, April 1, 1989; 110(7): 547 - 559. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1987 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |