This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lefkowitz, C. A. Articles by Buda, A. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lefkowitz, C. A. Articles by Buda, A. J.

Circulation, Vol 77, 915-926, Copyright © 1988 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

The effects of a critical stenosis on myocardial blood flow, ventricular function, and infarct size after coronary reperfusion

CA Lefkowitz, DP Pace, KP Gallagher and AJ Buda
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.

Immediate percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty has been advocated for patients with a residual stenosis after coronary thrombolysis because of the possibility that the residual stenosis may restrict reflow and thereby increase infarct size. Because there are few experimental data bearing on this issue, we measured left ventricular function, myocardial blood flow, and infarct size in 20 anesthetized open-chest dogs during 2 hr of left circumflex occlusion and 4 hr of reperfusion. Ten animals were reperfused through a critical stenosis of the left circumflex artery (critical stenosis group) and the remaining 10 animals underwent full reperfusion without stenosis (control group). In both groups, a comparable degree of echocardiographic systolic wall thinning was present during occlusion and partial recovery of global and regional left ventricular function in the two groups. Subendocardial blood flow was decreased in the critical stenosis group relative to the control group at 5 min after reperfusion (0.52 +/- 0.16 ml/min/g in the critical stenosis group vs 1.55 +/- 0.32 ml/min/g in the control group, p less than .05) but not at 4 hr after reperfusion, when a reduced reflow response was seen in both groups. No differences in subepicardial blood flow were seen in the two groups of animals. Infarct size was slightly greater in the critical stenosis group than the control group, but this difference was not statistically significant (infarct/risk area ratio: 55.5 +/- 7.8% in the critical stenosis group vs 39.4 +/- 9.7% in the control group, p = .21). A close inverse exponential relationship was seen between infarct size/risk area ratio and subendocardial blood flow during occlusion (r = .89, p = .001). Two control animals had high levels of subendocardial collateral flow (greater than 0.2 ml/min/g); when these animals were excluded from analysis, differences in the infarct size/risk area ratio in the control and critical stenosis groups were less striking: (55.5 +/- 7.8% in the critical stenosis group vs 48.4 +/- 9.6% in the control group). Thus, the presence of a critical stenosis results in restriction of hyperemic blood flow to the subendocardium after reperfusion but does not influence infarct size or early left ventricular functional recovery.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Hattori, H. Matsui, M. Kitano, Y. Ichihara, S. Ogawa, M. Hirai, H. Hayashi, and H. Saito Staged Reperfusion Preserves the Coronary Flow Reserve, Especially in the Regions Not Severely Damaged by Ischemic Injury in the Canine Heart Angiology, December 1, 1998; 49(12): 991 - 1004. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. D Verdouw, M. A van den Doel, S. de Zeeuw, and D. J Duncker Animal models in the study of myocardial ischaemia and ischaemic syndromes Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 1998; 39(1): 121 - 135. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Kapadia, J. S. Terlato, and A. S. Most Presence of a Critical Coronary Artery Stenosis Does Not Abolish the Protective Effect of Ischemic Preconditioning Circulation, March 4, 1997; 95(5): 1286 - 1292. [Abstract] [Full Text]