Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1988;78:566-572

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Bruyne, B.
Right arrow Articles by Rutishauser, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Bruyne, B.
Right arrow Articles by Rutishauser, W.

Circulation, Vol 78, 566-572, Copyright © 1988 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Potential protective effect of high coronary wedge pressure on left ventricular function after coronary occlusion

B de Bruyne, B Meier, L Finci, P Urban and W Rutishauser
Cardiology Center, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.

To assess the potential of coronary collateral circulation to protect myocardium after occlusion of a coronary vessel, the mean coronary wedge pressure, the angiographic grade of collateral channels, and the left ventricular function were studied in 47 consecutive patients with mechanical recanalization of totally occluded coronary arteries. Coronary wedge pressure measurements were obtained 39 +/- 51 days (range, 2 hours to 361 days) after the presumed time of occlusion. The patients were divided into two groups: 31 with a coronary wedge pressure more than 30 mm Hg (group 1) and 16 with a coronary wedge pressure of or less than 30 mm Hg (group 2). Patients in group 1 had a significantly higher mean global left ventricular ejection fraction than those in group 2 (63 +/- 9% vs. 49 +/- 7%, p less than 0.001). Regional left ventricular function (artery-related area change) was also superior in group 1 compared with group 2 (47 +/- 11% vs. 36 +/- 10%, p less than 0.01). Global left ventricular function was significantly correlated to coronary wedge pressure (r = 0.51, p less than 0.001) but not to the angiographic presence of collaterals. The data suggest that a high coronary wedge pressure is associated with improved left ventricular function after coronary artery occlusion and that coronary wedge pressure more accurately reflects the physiological role of collaterals than their angiographic presence.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICVTSHome page
J.-P. Verhoye, B. d. Latour, A. Drochon, and H. Corbineau
Collateral flow reserve and right coronary occlusion: evaluation during off-pump revascularization
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2005; 4(1): 23 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Sambuceti, M. Marzilli, S. Fedele, C. Marini, and A. L'Abbate
Paradoxical Increase in Microvascular Resistance During Tachycardia Downstream From a Severe Stenosis in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease : Reversal by Angioplasty
Circulation, May 15, 2001; 103(19): 2352 - 2360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
N. van Royen, J. J. Piek, I. Buschmann, I. Hoefer, M. Voskuil, and W. Schaper
Stimulation of arteriogenesis; a new concept for the treatment of arterial occlusive disease
Cardiovasc Res, February 16, 2001; 49(3): 543 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
K. Miwa, K. Nakagawa, T. Hirai, and H. Inoue
Exercise-induced U-wave alterations as a marker of well-developed and well-functioning collateral vessels in patients with effort angina
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 1, 2000; 35(3): 757 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. A. M. van Liebergen, J. J. Piek, K. T. Koch, R. J. de Winter, C. E. Schotborgh, and K. I. Lie
Quantification of collateral flow in humans: a comparison of angiographic, electrocardiographic and hemodynamic variables
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 1, 1999; 33(3): 670 - 677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]