Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1988;78:573-582

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smucker, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Feldman, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smucker, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Feldman, M. D.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stress

Circulation, Vol 78, 573-582, Copyright © 1988 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Demonstration of an imbalance between coronary perfusion and excessive load as a mechanism of ischemia during stress in patients with aortic stenosis

ML Smucker, CL Tedesco, SB Manning, RM Owen and MD Feldman
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville.

Patients with aortic stenosis are susceptible to myocardial ischemia during hemodynamic stress, which may be caused by two mechanisms. First, vascular abnormalities inherent in myocardial hypertrophy may impair coronary vasodilation, limiting the ability to increase coronary blood flow to meet increased metabolic demands. Second, aortic stenosis itself may cause an imbalance between oxygen supply and demand during hemodynamic stress by decreasing aortic pressure (decreasing coronary perfusion or oxygen supply) and increasing left ventricular pressure (increasing oxygen demand). By decreasing aortic valve gradient without immediately altering ventricular hypertrophy, aortic balloon valvuloplasty offers the opportunity to distinguish these mechanisms. We hypothesized that aortic valvuloplasty would improve the balance between myocardial oxygen supply and demand, especially during isoproterenol infusion. Nine patients undergoing aortic balloon valvuloplasty were assessed at baseline and during isoproterenol infusion (5 +/- 2 micrograms/min, mean +/- SD) before and after valvuloplasty. Valvuloplasty increased myocardial oxygen supply. After valvuloplasty, isoproterenol decreased diastolic pressure time index (DPTI) less and increased coronary sinus blood flow more than before valvuloplasty (-630 +/- 367 vs. -292 +/- 224 mm Hg.sec/min, p = 0.02 and 53 +/- 137 vs. 179 +/- 145 ml/min, p = 0.001, respectively). Valvuloplasty also decreased oxygen demand, decreasing systolic pressure time index (SPTI) from 4,135 +/- 511 to 3,021 +/- 492 mm Hg.sec/min (p = 0.0002). Valvuloplasty improved the balance between myocardial oxygen supply and demand, increasing baseline DPTI:SPTI, decreasing aortocoronary sinus oxygen content difference (0.51 +/- 0.15 to 0.68 +/- 0.14, p = 0.005 and 96 +/- 14 to 78 +/- 15 ml O2/l, p = 0.002, respectively), and decreasing myocardial lactate production during isoproterenol infusion (mean lactate extraction fraction, -0.26 +/- 0.40 to 0.14 +/- 0.17; p = 0.01). We conclude that aortic valvuloplasty improves the balance between myocardial oxygen supply and demand during hemodynamic stress induced by isoproterenol infusion. We speculate that the clinical improvement, which often occurs in these patients after valvuloplasty despite persistence of hemodynamically "critical" aortic stenosis, is in part attributable to immediate improvement in the myocardial oxygen supply:demand ratio.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. W.W. Biederman, M. Doyle, J. Yamrozik, R. B. Williams, V. K. Rathi, D. Vido, K. Caruppannan, N. Osman, V. Bress, G. Rayarao, et al.
Physiologic Compensation Is Supranormal in Compensated Aortic Stenosis: Does it Return to Normal After Aortic Valve Replacement or Is it Blunted by Coexistent Coronary Artery Disease?: An Intramyocardial Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9_suppl): I-429 - I-436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. H. Mehta, D. Bruckman, S. Das, T. Tsai, P. Russman, D. Karavite, H. Monaghan, S. Sonnad, M. J. Shea, K. A. Eagle, et al.
Implications of increased left ventricular mass index on in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2001; 122(5): 919 - 928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
I Ikonomidis, A Tsoukas, F Parthenakis, A Gournizakis, A Kassimatis, L Rallidis, and P Nihoyannopoulos
Four year follow up of aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic stenosis: a link between reduction in pressure overload, regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, and diastolic function
Heart, September 1, 2001; 86(3): 309 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. Dagenais, L. C. Pelletier, and M. Carrier
Antegrade/retrograde cardioplegia for valve replacement: a prospective study
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1999; 68(5): 1681 - 1685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Maffei, M. Baroni, M. Terrazzi, F. Paoli, P. Ferrazzi, and A. Biagini
Preoperative Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: A Dipyridamole Echocardiographic Study
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1998; 65(2): 397 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. N. Petropoulakis, M. K. Kyriakidis, C. A. Tentolouris, C. V. Kourouclis, and P. K. Toutouzas
Changes in Phasic Coronary Blood Flow Velocity Profile in Relation to Changes in Hemodynamic Parameters During Stress in Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis
Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1437 - 1447.
[Abstract] [Full Text]