Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1988;78:630-639

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swenson, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dahlberg, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Swenson, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dahlberg, S.

Circulation, Vol 78, 630-639, Copyright © 1988 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Hemodynamics in humans during conventional and experimental methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation

RD Swenson, WD Weaver, RA Niskanen, J Martin and S Dahlberg
Division of Cardiology, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98104.

High-fidelity hemodynamic recordings of aortic and right atrial pressures and the coronary perfusion gradient (the difference between aortic and atrial pressure) were made in nine patients during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Findings during conventional manual CPR were compared with those during high-impulse CPR (rate, 120 cycles/min with a shorter compression:relaxation ratio) as well as during pneumatic vest CPR with and without simultaneous ventilation and abdominal binding. Aortic peak pressure during conventional CPR averaged 61 +/- 29 mm Hg but varied widely (range, 39-126 mm Hg) among patients. Although the magnitude of improvement was modest, the high- impulse method was the only technique tested that significantly elevated both aortic peak pressure and the coronary perfusion gradient during cardiac arrest. During conventional CPR, aortic pressure rose from 61 +/- 29 to 80 +/- 39 mm Hg during high-impulse CPR, and the gradient rose from 9 +/- 11 to 14 +/- 15 mm Hg, respectively; p less than 0.01. The pneumatic vest method significantly improved peak aortic pressure but not the coronary perfusion gradient. Simultaneous ventilation and chest compression created high end-expiratory pressure and lowered the coronary perfusion gradient. Abdominal binding had no significant hemodynamic effects. This evaluation of experimental resuscitation methods in humans shows that the high-impulse chest compression method augments aortic pressure over levels achieved during conventional CPR methods; however, the improvement in pressure is modest and may not be clinically important. Simultaneous ventilation as well as abdominal binding during CPR were associated with no benefit; in fact, simultaneous ventilation appears to adversely affect cardiac perfusion and, therefore, should not be used during clinical resuscitation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
Part 4: Adult Basic Life Support
Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-19 - IV-34.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Part 6: CPR Techniques and Devices
Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-47 - IV-50.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Part 2: Adult Basic Life Support
Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22_suppl): III-5 - III-16.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Part 4: Advanced Life Support
Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22_suppl): III-25 - III-54.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
K. J. Tucker, M. A. Savitt, A. Idris, and R. F. Redberg
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Historical Perspectives, Physiology, and Future Directions
Arch Intern Med, October 10, 1994; 154(19): 2141 - 2150.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
H. R. Halperin, J. E. Tsitlik, M. Gelfand, M. L. Weisfeldt, K. G. Gruben, H. R. Levin, B. K. Rayburn, N. C. Chandra, C. J. Scott, B. J. Kreps, et al.
A Preliminary Study of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation by Circumferential Compression of the Chest with Use of a Pneumatic Vest
N. Engl. J. Med., September 9, 1993; 329(11): 762 - 768.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
Adult Advanced Cardiac Life Support
JAMA, October 28, 1992; 268(16): 2199 - 2241.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
K. B. Kern, A. B. Sanders, J. Raife, M. M. Milander, C. W. Otto, and G. A. Ewy
A Study of Chest Compression Rates During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Humans: The Importance of Rate-Directed Chest Compressions
Arch Intern Med, January 1, 1992; 152(1): 145 - 149.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. L. Weisfeldt and A. D. Guerci
Sodium Bicarbonate in CPR
JAMA, October 16, 1991; 266(15): 2129 - 2130.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
N. A. Paradis, G. B. Martin, J. Rosenberg, E. P. Rivers, M. G. Goetting, T. J. Appleton, M. Feingold, P. E. Cryer, J. Wortsman, and R. M. Nowak
The Effect of Standard- and High-Dose Epinephrine on Coronary Perfusion Pressure During Prolonged Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
JAMA, March 6, 1991; 265(9): 1139 - 1144.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
N. A. Paradis, G. B. Martin, E. P. Rivers, M. G. Goetting, T. J. Appleton, M. Feingold, and R. M. Nowak
Coronary Perfusion Pressure and the Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Human Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
JAMA, February 23, 1990; 263(8): 1106 - 1113.
[Abstract] [PDF]