Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1988;78:1144-1149

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kallok, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kallok, M. J.

Circulation, Vol 78, 1144-1149, Copyright © 1988 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Prediction of defibrillation success from a single defibrillation threshold measurement with sequential pulses and two current pathways in humans

DL Jones, GJ Klein, GM Guiraudon, AD Sharma, R Yee and MJ Kallok
Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

The ultimate aim of defibrillation testing is to predict consistent defibrillation. This study tested the hypothesis that defibrillation success could be predicted from a single measurement of defibrillation threshold. We measured defibrillation threshold by using three patch electrodes and a standard protocol intraoperatively in 49 patients undergoing arrhythmia surgery. Each patient was then assigned to one of five energy subgroups (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, or 2.5 times defibrillation threshold) for a single shock (followed by a rescue shock if necessary) for a subsequent ventricular fibrillation episode. A curve relating percent success to energy was then constructed for the group. Defibrillation threshold averaged 4.7 +/- 2.98 J for the group (mean +/- SD). There was a curvilinear relation between the energy of the defibrillation threshold ratio test shock and percent success: 33.3%, 58.3%, 81.8%, 91.7%, and 100% at mean defibrillation threshold ratios of 0.56 +/- 0.14, 1.02 +/- 0.07, 1.53 +/- 0.14, 1.88 +/- 0.09, and 2.60 +/- 0.14, respectively. We conclude that consistent defibrillation is predictable from a single measurement of defibrillation threshold. Furthermore, for an individual patient, a safety margin of 2.6 times defibrillation threshold should approximate 100% successful defibrillation for a single test shock.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. A. Strickberger, E. G. Daoud, T. Davidson, R. Weiss, F. Bogun, B. P. Knight, M. Bahu, R. Goyal, K. C. Man, and F. Morady
Probability of Successful Defibrillation at Multiples of the Defibrillation Energy Requirement in Patients With an Implantable Defibrillator
Circulation, August 19, 1997; 96(4): 1217 - 1223.
[Abstract] [Full Text]