This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kadish, A. Articles by Spear, J. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kadish, A. Articles by Spear, J. F.

Circulation, Vol 78, 1478-1494, Copyright © 1988 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Interaction of fiber orientation and direction of impulse propagation with anatomic barriers in anisotropic canine myocardium

A Kadish, M Shinnar, EN Moore, JH Levine, CW Balke and JF Spear
Department of Animal Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

We developed a computer model of the interaction of impulse propagation with anatomic barriers in uniformly anisotropic tissue. Its predictions were confirmed experimentally by using an in vitro cut to create a 6 X 1-mm anatomic barrier in 12 canine epicardial strips. The model predicted that long, thin barriers located parallel to the direction of impulse propagation would have little effect in delaying conduction regardless of the arrangement of cardiac fibers. In this situation, the mean experimental ratio of postcut to control conduction times across the barrier was 1.05:1.00 in 10 tissues. When impulses were proceeding perpendicular to an anatomic barrier, significant distal conduction delay was predicted and found to occur only when the conduction from pacing to recording sites was initially longitudinal to fiber orientation (mean experimental ratio, 2.34:1.00 in five tissues) but not transverse to fiber orientation (ratio, 1.08:1.00 in five tissues). We conclude that the direction of initial impulse propagation and the orientation of myocardial fibers have large effects on the degree to which anatomic barriers delay activation in cardiac tissue. These findings may have implications for the participation of anatomic barriers in reentrant circuits.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. G. KLEBER and Y. RUDY Basic Mechanisms of Cardiac Impulse Propagation and Associated Arrhythmias Physiol Rev, April 1, 2004; 84(2): 431 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. F. Scollan, A. Holmes, R. Winslow, and J. Forder Histological validation of myocardial microstructure obtained from diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 1998; 275(6): H2308 - H2318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. T.S. Konings, J. L.R.M. Smeets, O. C. Penn, H. J.J. Wellens, and M. A. Allessie Configuration of Unipolar Atrial Electrograms During Electrically Induced Atrial Fibrillation in Humans Circulation, March 4, 1997; 95(5): 1231 - 1241. [Abstract] [Full Text]