This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nellessen, U. Articles by Popp, R. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nellessen, U. Articles by Popp, R. L.

Circulation, Vol 79, 330-336, Copyright © 1989 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Mitral prosthesis malfunction. Comparative Doppler echocardiographic studies of mitral prostheses before and after replacement

U Nellessen, T Masuyama, CP Appleton, T Tye and RL Popp
Division of Cardiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305.

To assess the influence of mitral prosthesis malfunction on various Doppler echocardiographic indexes, we studied the changes in the peak mitral flow velocity during early diastolic filling phase (Vmax), the mean transprosthesis pressure drop from the simplified Bernoulli equation, the mitral valve area by the pressure half-time method, and the left ventricular isovolumic relaxation time in 15 patients before and after replacement of the malfunctioning mitral prosthesis using continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. Examination of the 15 replaced prostheses revealed a torn or perforated leaflet in 12 valves and a sewing ring dehiscence in one valve. Additional restricted leaflet motion (classified as mild obstruction) was seen in three of these 13 valves. In the remaining two valves, severe prosthesis obstruction was noted. Changes in the Doppler indexes between the preoperative and postoperative study were present in all patients regarding Vmax (mean, 2.2 +/- 0.3 versus 1.6 +/- 0.2 m/sec; p less than 0.001), mean gradient (mean, 9 +/- 5 versus 5 +/- 0.8 mm Hg; p less than 0.001), and isovolumic relaxation time (mean, 47 +/- 12 msec versus 80 +/- 13 msec; p less than 0.001). The mean mitral valve area remained virtually unchanged (2.3 +/- 0.9 versus 2.6 +/- 0.3 cm2; p = NS) but increased postoperatively in each patient with preoperative mild or severe prosthesis obstruction without concomitant aortic regurgitation. Our conclusion is that the peak mitral flow velocity, the mean gradient, and the isovolumic relaxation time are useful parameters in the differentiation of normal and abnormal mitral prosthesis function but may not define the underlying lesion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)