This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rossen, J. D. Articles by Winniford, M. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rossen, J. D. Articles by Winniford, M. D.

Circulation, Vol 79, 566-572, Copyright © 1989 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Coronary dilation with standard dose dipyridamole and dipyridamole combined with handgrip

JD Rossen, I Simonetti, ML Marcus and MD Winniford
Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Division, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.

Intravenous dipyridamole is widely used to produce coronary vasodilation during cardiac imaging procedures. However, the routinely used dose of dipyridamole (0.56 mg/kg IV over 4 min) does not always result in maximal coronary dilation. The addition of isometric handgrip during dipyridamole coronary dilation has been reported to substantially increase coronary blood flow over dipyridamole alone. We compared the coronary vasodilation resulting from infusion of the standard dose of dipyridamole with that resulting from a maximally dilating dose of intracoronary papaverine in 12 patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries. We also assessed the effect on coronary blood flow velocity of the addition of isometric handgrip during dipyridamole coronary dilation. Changes in coronary blood flow velocity were measured with a 3F coronary Doppler catheter. The coronary flow reserve (peak/resting coronary flow velocity ratio) after dipyridamole (3.7 +/- 1.2 [mean +/- SD] was less than that seen after papaverine (4.4 +/- 0.5, p less than 0.05), and the coronary vascular resistance index during dipyridamole coronary vasodilation (0.28 +/- 0.09) was greater than during papaverine (0.22 +/- 0.03, p less than 0.05). The dipyridamole coronary flow reserve was less than 3.0 in four subjects and was 2.0 or less in two subjects. The addition of isometric handgrip to dipyridamole coronary vasodilation produced an 8% increase in mean heart rate and a 17% increase in mean arterial pressure, but coronary flow reserve was unchanged (3.8 +/- 1.1 before handgrip vs. 4.0 +/- 1.1 with handgrip). Quantitative angiography in six patients revealed no change in coronary caliber with the addition of handgrip.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. J.W. Chow, K. Ananthasubramaniam, R. A. deKemp, M. M. Dalipaj, R. S.B. Beanlands, and T. D. Ruddy Comparison of treadmill exercise versus dipyridamole stress with myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 19, 2005; 45(8): 1227 - 1234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Voudris, D. Avramides, M. Koutelou, J. Malakos, A. Manginas, M. Papadakis, and D. V. Cokkinos Relative Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve Improves Correlation With Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenoses Chest, October 1, 2003; 124(4): 1266 - 1274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Chareonthaitawee, P. A Kaufmann, O. Rimoldi, and P. G Camici Heterogeneity of resting and hyperemic myocardial blood flow in healthy humans Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2001; 50(1): 151 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Spyrou, M. A. Khan, S. D. Rosen, R. Foale, D. W. Davies, F. Sogliani, R. D. L. Stanbridge, and P. G. Camici Persistent but reversible coronary microvascular dysfunction after bypass grafting Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2000; 279(6): H2634 - H2640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. S. Huggins, R. C. Pasternak, N. M. Alpert, A. J. Fischman, and H. Gewirtz Effects of Short-Term Treatment of Hyperlipidemia on Coronary Vasodilator Function and Myocardial Perfusion in Regions Having Substantial Impairment of Baseline Dilator Reverse Circulation, September 29, 1998; 98(13): 1291 - 1296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. K. Julius, M. Spillmann, G. Vassalli, B. Villari, F. R. Eberli, and O. M. Hess Angina Pectoris in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Normal Coronary Arteries: Mechanisms and Pathophysiological Concepts Circulation, February 18, 1997; 95(4): 892 - 898. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. Di Carli, J. Czernin, C. K. Hoh, V. H. Gerbaudo, R. C. Brunken, S.-C. Huang, M. E. Phelps, and H. R. Schelbert Relation Among Stenosis Severity, Myocardial Blood Flow, and Flow Reserve in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Circulation, April 1, 1995; 91(7): 1944 - 1951. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				N. G. Uren, J. A. Melin, B. De Bruyne, W. Wijns, T. Baudhuin, and P. G. Camici Relation between Myocardial Blood Flow and the Severity of Coronary-Artery Stenosis N. Engl. J. Med., June 23, 1994; 330(25): 1782 - 1788. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. A. Beller Pharmacologic Stress Imaging JAMA, February 6, 1991; 265(5): 633 - 638. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. E. Langerak, P. Kunz, H. W. Vliegen, J. W. Jukema, A. H. Zwinderman, P. Steendijk, H. J. Lamb, E. E. van der Wall, and A. de Roos MR Flow Mapping in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts: A Validation Study with Doppler Flow Measurements Radiology, January 1, 2002; 222(1): 127 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]