This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Epstein, L. M. Articles by Griffin, J. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Epstein, L. M. Articles by Griffin, J. C.

Circulation, Vol 80, 757-768, Copyright © 1989 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Percutaneous catheter modification of the atrioventricular node. A potential cure for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

LM Epstein, MM Scheinman, JJ Langberg, D Chilson, HR Goldberg and JC Griffin
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

Our purpose was to describe a technique of atrioventricular (AV) node modification for patients with drug refractory AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Nine patients (mean age, 45 +/- 20; range, 14-82) with recurrent drug refractory AVNRT (n = 8) or sudden cardiac death thought to be precipitated by AVNRT (n = 1) underwent a percutaneous catheter procedure to modify AV nodal function. The area between the electrode recording the maximal His-bundle electrogram and the ostium of the coronary sinus was divided into three zones. Perinodal direct current shocks of 100-300 J were delivered to one (n = 2), two (n = 3), or three (n = 4) zones without complications. The procedure endpoints were modification of AV conduction (either first degree AV block or complete retrograde ventriculo-atrial [VA] block) and failure to induce AVNRT before or after isoproterenol and/or atropine administration. Six of nine patients (67%) have had no inducible or spontaneous AVNRT over a mean follow-up of 12.3 +/- 4.1 months (range, 4.5-17). One of the six underwent repeat, successful modification, because AVNRT was inducible at restudy 2 days after the initial procedure. AVNRT recurred in three patients (33%), one early (3 days) and two late (3-4 months). Two of these patients underwent complete ablation of the AV junction and permanent pacemaker placement, whereas one is controlled with drug therapy. Therefore, AV nodal modification resulted in tachycardia control without antiarrhythmic drugs in six of nine (67%) and obviated the need for complete AV junctional ablation in seven of nine patients (78%). Elimination of AVNRT appears to result from either block in the retrograde fast pathway or modification of the antegrade slow pathway, such that AVNRT cannot be sustained. Additional findings suggest that an atrio-Hisian accessory connection may not be involved in AVNRT in some of these patients. Percutaneous catheter AV nodal modification appears to be a promising technique for treatment of refractory AVNRT and may obviate need for complete AV junctional ablation in a substantial number of patients with drug/pacemaker refractory AVNRT.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. E. Eckart and L. M. Epstein Interventional Therapy for Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1357 - 1374. [Full Text]

				S. D. Satti and L. M. Epstein Cardiologic Interventional Therapy for Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1253 - 1270. [Full Text]

				D. Medkour, A. E. Becker, K. Khalife, and J. Billette Anatomic and Functional Characteristics of a Slow Posterior AV Nodal Pathway : Role in Dual-Pathway Physiology and Reentry Circulation, July 14, 1998; 98(2): 164 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Janse, T. Opthof, and A. G. Kleber Animal models of cardiac arrhythmias Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 1998; 39(1): 165 - 177. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Epstein, W. M. Miles, D. G. Benditt, A. J. Camm, E. J. Darling, P. L. Friedman, A. Garson, J. C. Harvey, G. A. Kidwell, G. J. Klein, et al. Personal and Public Safety Issues Related to Arrhythmias That May Affect Consciousness: Implications for Regulation and Physician Recommendations: A Medical/Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology Circulation, September 1, 1996; 94(5): 1147 - 1166. [Full Text]

				F. Anselme, B. Hook, K. Monahan, J. Frederiks, D. Callans, M. Zardini, L. M. Epstein, J. Zebede, and M. E. Josephson Heterogeneity of Retrograde Fast-Pathway Conduction Pattern in Patients With Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia : Observations by Use of Simultaneous Multisite Catheter Mapping of Koch's Triangle Circulation, March 1, 1996; 93(5): 960 - 968. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. Sra, M. Jazayeri, A. Natale, A. Dhala, Z. Blanck, S. Deshpande, C. Maglio, S. Bremner, and M. Akhtar Termination of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia by Premature Stimulation From Ablating Catheter : A Reliable Guide to Identify Site for Slow-Pathway Ablation Circulation, February 15, 1995; 91(4): 1095 - 1100. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				T. G. Trouton, S. S. O'Nunain, Y. H. Kim, G. E. Sosa-Suarez, H. Garan, and J. N. Ruskin Curative Transcatheter Radiofrequency Current Ablation for Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia Arch Intern Med, June 13, 1994; 154(11): 1226 - 1231. [Abstract] [PDF]