This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stevenson, W. G. Articles by Sherman, C. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stevenson, W. G. Articles by Sherman, C. T.

Circulation, Vol 80, 793-806, Copyright © 1989 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Programmed electrical stimulation at potential ventricular reentry circuit sites. Comparison of observations in humans with predictions from computer simulations

WG Stevenson, K Nademanee, JN Weiss, I Wiener, K Baron, LA Yeatman and CT Sherman
Department of Internal Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine.

The purpose of this study was to define specific types of resetting responses to programmed electrical stimulation during human ventricular tachycardia and to use computer simulations of reentry circuits to assess the possible mechanisms and pacing site location relative to the reentry circuit for each type of response. The effects of scanning single stimuli at 35 left ventricular endocardial sites during sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in 12 patients were studied. In considering alterations in QRS configuration and the delay between the stimulus and the advanced QRS, we identified three types of resetting responses to scanning stimuli consistent with stimulation at sites in or near the reentry circuit at 12 abnormal endocardial sites in eight patients. Type 1: all capturing stimuli were followed after a delay by early QRS complexes that had the same configuration as the tachycardia complexes. Type 2: late stimuli reset tachycardia as in type 1 but early stimuli reset the tachycardia after altering the QRS configuration. Type 3: late stimuli reset tachycardia as in type 1, but early stimuli advanced tachycardia with a short stimulus to QRS delay without altering the QRS configuration. In the simulations, premature depolarization of sites in the circuit produced orthodromic and antidromic wavefronts. The orthodromic wavefront propagated through the circuit and exited the circuit at the same site as did the previous tachycardia wavefronts and advanced the tachycardia without altering the configuration of the advanced QRS. The antidromic wavefront of relatively late stimuli was confined within or near the circuit by collision with the orthodromic wavefront of the preceding tachycardia beat and failed to alter ventricular activation distant from the circuit. Therefore, the QRS configuration after the stimulus was unchanged. A type 1 response occurred when all capturing stimuli produced this effect. However, with increasing stimulus prematurity, the antidromic wavefront propagated farther before colliding with an orthodromic wavefront, and under some conditions, it exited the circuit from a site other than the original circuit "exit," and altered the ventricular activation sequence distant from the circuit and, therefore, the QRS configuration, producing a type 2 pattern. The type 3 pattern occurred when the antidromic wavefront of early premature beats captured the original circuit exit. The effect of a stimulus was dependent on the stimulus prematurity, the relative conduction times from the stimulation site to the potential sites of "exit" from the circuit, and the timing of the excitable gap at the stimulation site.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N Saoudi, F Cosio, A Waldo, S.A Chen, Y Iesaka, M Lesh, S Saksena, J Salerno, and W Schoels A classification of atrial flutter and regular atrial tachycardia according to electrophysiological mechanisms and anatomical bases. A Statement from a Joint Expert Group from the Working Group of Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2001; 22(14): 1162 - 1182. [PDF]

				K. Soejima, W. G. Stevenson, W. H. Maisel, E. Delacretaz, C. B. Brunckhorst, K. E. Ellison, and P. L. Friedman The N + 1 difference: a new measure for entrainment mapping J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2001; 37(5): 1386 - 1394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Schalij, F. P. van Rugge, M. Siezenga, and E. T. van der Velde Endocardial Activation Mapping of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients : First Application of a 32-Site Bipolar Mapping Electrode Catheter Circulation, November 17, 1998; 98(20): 2168 - 2179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. N. Weiss, K. Nademanee, W. G. Stevenson, and B. Singh Ventricular Arrhythmias in Ischemic Heart Disease Ann Intern Med, May 1, 1991; 114(9): 784 - 797. [Abstract] [PDF]