Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1989;80:893-902

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tonolo, G.
Right arrow Articles by Glorioso, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tonolo, G.
Right arrow Articles by Glorioso, N.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure
Hazardous Substances DB
*MAGNESIUM COMPOUNDS
*MAGNESIUM, ELEMENTAL

Circulation, Vol 80, 893-902, Copyright © 1989 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Low-dose infusion of atrial natriuretic factor in mild essential hypertension

G Tonolo, AM Richards, P Manunta, C Troffa, A Pazzola, P Madeddu, A Towrie, R Fraser and N Glorioso
Centro Ipertensione, Patologia Medica, Universita degli studi di Sassari, Italy.

Intra-arterial blood pressure, cardiac output, heart rate, right heart indexes, urinary electrolytes, and urinary volume were monitored in eight patients with untreated (WHO Class I) essential hypertension. The patients were given synthetic atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) (99-126 alpha-hANP) at 1 and 2 pmol/kg/min in series (phases 1 and 2, 2 hours each dose) or vehicle (hemaccel) in random order on two separate occasions while on their usual diet. Arterial plasma ANF levels increased significantly from basal and time-matched placebo values from 25 +/- 2 and 28 +/- 3 pmol/l to 50 +/- 4 and 83 +/- 9 pmol/l at the end of phases 1 and 2, respectively (p less than 0.001). After 30 minutes during phase 2, systolic blood pressure decreased significantly by 20 +/- 4 mm Hg (p less than 0.001) from basal and time-matched placebo values and remained significantly reduced (-17 +/- 4 mm Hg, p less than 0.001) by the end of the recovery period (2 hours after infusions were completed). Pulmonary systolic blood pressure decreased by 5 +/- 1 mm Hg (phase 2, p less than 0.05). Cardiac output decreased by 0.5 +/- 0.1 l/min below baseline at the end of phase 2 of ANF infusion, whereas it increased significantly (p less than 0.02) by 0.6 +/- 0.1 l/min during vehicle infusion. Systemic diastolic, pulmonary diastolic, right atrial, and wedge pressures were not significantly changed during ANF or vehicle infusions, nor were pulmonary vascular resistance or heart rate altered. Systemic vascular resistance did not change significantly during both infusions, whereas during recovery, systemic vascular resistance decreased significantly after ANF infusion was discontinued (p less than 0.05). Microhematocrit levels increased dose dependently during ANF. The maximum increase was observed at the end of phase 2 (+4.7 +/- 1.7%), whereas the microhematocrit level decreased to -2.4 +/- 0.6% with vehicle (p less than 0.001) at the end of phase 2. Urinary sodium excretion increased significantly (p less than 0.02) by the end of phase 2 under ANF infusion (+38 +/- 15%), whereas it decreased (-10 +/- 6%) under placebo infusion by the end of phase 2. Urinary magnesium excretion was significantly increased during ANF infusion from phase 1 (p less than 0.02), whereas urinary potassium levels, calcium levels, creatinine levels, volume, and glomerular filtration rate did not differ significantly between the two infusions. Plasma renin, angiotensin II, aldosterone, and catecholamine concentrations did not change significantly during ANF or vehicle infusions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
T. Wei, C. Zeng, L. Chen, Q. Chen, R. Zhao, G. Lu, C. Lu, and L. Wang
Bedside tests of B-type natriuretic peptide in the diagnosis of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in hypertensive patients
Eur J Heart Fail, January 1, 2005; 7(1): 75 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
H. Peter Brunner-La Rocca, W. Kiowski, D. Ramsay, and G. Sutsch
Therapeutic benefits of increasing natriuretic peptide levels
Cardiovasc Res, August 15, 2001; 51(3): 510 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
G. B. Pidgeon, A. M. Richards, M. G. Nicholls, E. A. Espiner, T. G. Yandle, and C. Frampton
Differing Metabolism and Bioactivity of Atrial and Brain Natriuretic Peptides in Essential Hypertension
Hypertension, April 1, 1996; 27(4): 906 - 913.
[Abstract] [Full Text]