This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Honan, M. B. Articles by Mark, D. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Honan, M. B. Articles by Mark, D. B.

Circulation, Vol 80, 1585-1594, Copyright © 1989 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Exercise treadmill testing is a poor predictor of anatomic restenosis after angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

MB Honan, JR Bengtson, DB Pryor, DS Rendall, RS Stack, T Hinohara, TN Skelton, RM Califf, MA Hlatky and DB Mark
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

This study evaluated whether an exercise treadmill test could predict restenosis in 289 patients 6 months after a successful emergency angioplasty of the infarct-related artery for acute myocardial infarction. After excluding those with interim interventions (64), medical events (36), or medical contraindications to follow-up testing (25), both a treadmill test and a cardiac catheterization were completed in 144 patients, 88% of those eligible for this assessment. Four patients with left bundle branch block or pacemaker rhythm at the time of treadmill testing were also excluded from analysis. Of six follow-up clinical and treadmill variables examined by multivariable logistic regression analysis, only exercise ST deviation was independently correlated with restenosis at follow-up (chi 2 = 5, p = 0.02). The clinical diagnosis of angina at follow-up, although marginally related to restenosis when considered by itself (p = 0.04), did not add significant information once ST deviation was known. The sensitivity of ST deviation of 0.10 mV or greater for detecting restenosis was only 24% (13 of 55 patients), and the specificity was 88% (75 of 85 patients). The sensitivity of exercise-induced ST deviation for detection of restenosis was not affected by extent or severity of wall motion abnormalities at follow-up, by the timing of thrombolytic therapy or of angioplasty, or by the presence of collateral blood flow at the time of acute angiography. A second multivariable analysis evaluating the association of the same variables with number of vessels with significant coronary disease at the 6-month catheterization found an association with both exercise ST deviation (p = 0.003) and exercise duration (p = 0.04). Angina symptoms and exercise treadmill test results in this population had limited value for predicting anatomic restenosis 6 months after emergency angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Bernhardt, J. Spiess, B. Levenson, G. Pilz, B. Hofling, V. Hombach, and O. Strohm Combined Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion and Late Gadolinium Enhancement in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Bypass Grafts: A Multicenter Study of an Integrated Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Protocol J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., November 1, 2009; 2(11): 1292 - 1300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Nagel, T. Thouet, C. Klein, S. Schalla, A. Bornstedt, B. Schnackenburg, J. Hug, E. Wellnhofer, and E. Fleck Noninvasive Determination of Coronary Blood Flow Velocity With Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Patients After Stent Deployment Circulation, April 8, 2003; 107(13): 1738 - 1743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. C. Smith Jr, J. T. Dove, A. K. Jacobs, J. Ward Kennedy, D. Kereiakes, M. J. Kern, R. E. Kuntz, J. J. Popma, H. V. Schaff, D. O. Williams, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines): A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2001; 37(8): 2239 - 2239. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. G. Hundley, L. D. Hillis, C. A. Hamilton, R. J. Applegate, D. M. Herrington, G. D. Clarke, G. A. Braden, M. S. Thomas, R. A. Lange, R. M. Peshock, et al. Assessment of Coronary Arterial Restenosis With Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements of Coronary Flow Reserve Circulation, May 23, 2000; 101(20): 2375 - 2381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Bauters, P. Khanoyan, E. P. Mc Fadden, P. Quandalle, J.-M. Lablanche, and M. E. Bertrand Restenosis After Delayed Coronary Angioplasty of the Culprit Vessel in Patients With a Recent Myocardial Infarction Treated by Thrombolysis Circulation, March 1, 1995; 91(5): 1410 - 1418. [Abstract] [Full Text]