Circulation, Vol 81, 37-45, Copyright © 1990 by American Heart Association
LL Johnson, DW Seldin, AM Keller, RM Wall, K Bhatia, CO Bingham 3d and ME Tresgallo
Forty-two patients (28 men and 14 women) with acute myocardial infarction
(35 Q, seven non-Q wave) were injected with 2.0 mCi indium 111-labeled
antimyosin (AM) monoclonal antibody (111In AM) within 48 hours of the onset
of chest pain. Forty-eight hours later (72-96 hours after onset of chest
pain), patients were injected with 2.2 mCi thallium 201, and two sets of
single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images were obtained
simultaneously using dual energy windows set for the 247 keV indium
photopeak and the 70 keV thallium peak. Seventeen patients had repeat scans
at 4 hours. 111In AM uptake and 201Tl defects were localized to one or more
of 24 coronal and sagittal segments. Scans with only 201Tl defects and
corresponding 111In AM uptake were classified as matches; scans with
unmatched 201Tl defects in addition to matching regions corresponding to
electrocardiographic infarct location were classified as mismatches; and
scans with 201Tl and 111In AM uptake in the same segments were classified
as overlap. Scan patterns were correlated with clinical evidence for
residual ischemia occurring within 6 weeks of infarct and including infarct
extension, recurrent angina, and positive predischarge low-level or 6-week
symptom-limited stress tests and with coronary anatomy. Fourteen patients
had only matching patterns (group 1), 23 had mismatches (group 2), and five
had 201Tl-111In overlap as the predominant pattern. None of the patients in
group 1 had previous myocardial infarction; in each, the matched area
corresponded to the Q wave location on electrocardiogram, and none had
further in-hospital ischemic events or positive stress tests.(ABSTRACT
TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
ARTICLES
Dual isotope thallium and indium antimyosin SPECT imaging to identify acute infarct patients at further ischemic risk
Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K Shimada, Y Sakanoue, Y Kobayashi, S Ehara, M Hirose, Y Nakamura, D Fukuda, H Yamagishi, M Yoshiyama, K Takeuchi, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability using coronary zero flow pressure after successful angioplasty in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction Heart, January 1, 2003; 89(1): 71 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sklenar, G. Camarano, N. C. Goodman, S. Ismail, A. R. Jayaweera, and S. Kaul Contractile Versus Microvascular Reserve for the Determination of the Extent of Myocardial Salvage After Reperfusion: The Effect of Residual Coronary Stenosis Circulation, September 15, 1996; 94(6): 1430 - 1440. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Zaret and F. J. Wackers Nuclear Cardiology- Second of Two Parts N. Engl. J. Med., September 16, 1993; 329(12): 855 - 863. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M.G. Niemeye, E.E. Van der Wall, E.K.J. Pauwels, P.R.M. van Dijkman, J.A.K. Blokland, A. de Roos, and A.V.G. Bruschke Assessment of Acute Myocardial Infarction by Nuclear Imaging Techniques Angiology, September 1, 1992; 43(9): 720 - 733. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1990 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |