This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van Daele, M. E. Articles by Roelandt, J. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Daele, M. E. Articles by Roelandt, J. R.

Circulation, Vol 81, 865-871, Copyright © 1990 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Do changes in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure adequately reflect myocardial ischemia during anesthesia? A correlative preoperative hemodynamic, electrocardiographic, and transesophageal echocardiographic study

ME van Daele, GR Sutherland, MM Mitchell, AG Fraser, O Prakash, EN Rulf and JR Roelandt
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Rotterdam-Dijkzigt, The Netherlands.

Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) is monitored during anesthesia in an attempt to detect changes in myocardial function in patients at risk of preoperative cardiac complications. Because the sensitivity with which preoperative PCWP monitoring indicates myocardial ischemia is uncertain, we monitored PCWP, 12-lead electrocardiogram, and left ventricular wall motion abnormalities as defined by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in 98 anesthetized patients before coronary artery bypass grafting. Measurements were made five times in each patient, before and after induction of anesthesia. Myocardial ischemia was identified by TEE in 14 patients; in 10 of these, it was associated with concomitant ST segment depression of at least 1 mm. The onset of ischemia, as defined by TEE, was accompanied by a mean increase in PCWP of 3.5 +/- 4.8 mm Hg, as compared with a mean change of 0 +/- 2.2 mm Hg between observations not associated with the onset of ischemia (p less than 0.01). An increase in PCWP of at least 3 mm Hg, tested as an indicator of ischemia, had a sensitivity of 25% and a positive predictive value of 15%; after correction for background changes associated with anesthetic induction, the sensitivity of this indicator was 33%, and its positive predictive value was 16%. These figures were not improved by selecting cutoff points higher or lower than 3 mm Hg. In this study, the onset of myocardial ischemia was associated with a small yet significant increase in mean PCWP at group level.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. S. Savino and A. T. Cheung Cardiac Anesthesia Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 281 - 314. [Full Text]

				J. S. Shanewise How to Reliably Detect Ischemia in the Intensive Care Unit and Operating Room Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2006; 10(1): 101 - 109. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. N. Ghansah and J. T. Murphy Complications of Major Aortic and Lower Extremity Vascular Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2004; 8(4): 335 - 361. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. S. Savino, T. F. Floyd, and A. T. Cheung Cardiac Anesthesia Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 249 - 281. [Full Text]

				J. A. Fox, V. Formanek, A. Friedrich, and S. K. Shernan Intraoperative Echocardiography Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 283 - 314. [Full Text]

				P. Couture, A. Denault, P. Limoges, P. Sheridan, D. Babin, and R. Cartier Mechanisms of hemodynamic changes during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: [Les mecanismes de changements hemodynamiques pendant le pontage aortocoronarien a coeur battant] Can J Anesth, October 1, 2002; 49(8): 835 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Mierdl, C. Byhahn, S. Dogan, T. Aybek, G. Wimmer-Greinecker, P. Kessler, D. Meininger, and K. Westphal Segmental Wall Motion Abnormalities During Telerobotic Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2002; 94(4): 774 - 780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Miller, A.-S. Lambert, W. A. Shapiro, I. A. Russell, N. B. Schiller, and M. K. Cahalan The Adequacy of Basic Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography Performed by Experienced Anesthesiologists Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2001; 92(5): 1103 - 1110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Shanewise, A. T. Cheung, S. Aronson, W. J. Stewart, R. L. Weiss, J. B. Mark, R. M. Savage, P. Sears-Rogan, J. P. Mathew, M. A. Quinones, et al. ASE/SCA Guidelines for Performing a Comprehensive Intraoperative Multiplane Transesophageal Echocardiography Examination: Recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography Council for Intraoperative Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force for Certification in Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography Anesth. Analg., October 1, 1999; 89(4): 870 - 870. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. G. Daniel and A. Mugge Transesophageal Echocardiography N. Engl. J. Med., May 11, 1995; 332(19): 1268 - 1280. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A Hessel II Review article : What's new in monitoring the coronary surgery patient? Perfusion, July 1, 1992; 7(3): 161 - 194. [Abstract] [PDF]