Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1990;81:1312-1318

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nitenberg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vernant, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nitenberg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vernant, P.

Circulation, Vol 81, 1312-1318, Copyright © 1990 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Recovery of a normal coronary vascular reserve after rejection therapy in acute human cardiac allograft rejection

A Nitenberg, O Tavolaro, C Benvenuti, D Loisance, JM Foult, L Hittinger, A Castaigne, JP Cachera and P Vernant
Service d'Explorations Fonctionnelles, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Xavier Bichat, Paris, France.

During acute rejection, coronary vascular reserve is severely impaired in human orthotopic heart transplants. To evaluate the effects of rejection therapy on coronary vascular reserve, the ratio of peak-to- resting coronary flow velocity was assessed with a coronary Doppler catheter and a maximally vasodilating dose of intracoronary papaverine (12 mg) in nine allograft recipients without rejection (group 1) and in six recipients before and after treatment of an acute episode of rejection (group 2). All the patients had normal epicardial coronary arteries and were free of left ventricular hypertrophy. In group 2 during rejection, the coronary vascular reserve was significantly lower than in group 1, in which all the patients had a peak-to-resting coronary flow velocity ratio greater than 4 (2.3 +/- 0.5 vs. 5.4 +/- 0.8, respectively, p less than 0.001). In group 2 after treatment of rejection, the peak-to-resting coronary flow velocity ratio was similar to that of group 1 (4.7 +/- 0.8). Heart rate, left ventricular volumes and pressures, hemoglobin concentration, and arterial oxygen pressure were similar in the two groups. This study provides evidence that alterations of coronary vascular reserve because of acute rejection were reversible after treatment of the rejection episode.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. L. Wolford, T. J. Donohue, R. G. Bach, J. H. Drury, E. A. Caracciolo, M. J. Kern, and L. W. Miller
Heterogeneity of Coronary Flow Reserve in the Examination of Multiple Individual Allograft Coronary Arteries
Circulation, February 9, 1999; 99(5): 626 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. F. Kofoed, J. Czernin, J. Johnson, J. Kobashigawa, M. E. Phelps, H. Laks, and H. R. Schelbert
Effects of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy on Myocardial Blood Flow, Vasodilatory Capacity, and Coronary Vasomotion
Circulation, February 4, 1997; 95(3): 600 - 606.
[Abstract] [Full Text]